Skip to main content
Glama

Oshyn Free AI-Powered Website Tools

ask_for_budget_contact_info

Asks for contact information in Budget Estimator sessions

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "sessionId": "<sessionId>"
    },
    "name": "ask_for_budget_contact_info"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
sessionIdYesThe sessionId from the current chat context

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden of transparency. 'Asks for contact information' indicates an interactive prompting action, but it does not disclose whether the information is persisted, what happens after asking, or any side effects, leaving some behavioral ambiguity.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that immediately conveys the tool's purpose and context. No unnecessary words or redundant information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple one-parameter schema and presence of an output schema, the description provides sufficient context for basic selection and invocation. However, it does not explain how this tool relates to the register_budget_contact_info tool or when in the Budget flow to invoke it, which limits completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with the only parameter (sessionId) already described as 'The sessionId from the current chat context'. The description adds no additional semantic meaning about parameters, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('asks for'), the object ('contact information'), and the specific context ('in Budget Estimator sessions'). The inclusion of 'Budget' distinguishes it from sibling tools like ask_for_advisor_contact_info and ask_for_dxp_contact_info.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'in Budget Estimator sessions' provides clear context for when the tool should be used. It does not explicitly mention alternatives or exclusion criteria, but this context is enough to differentiate it from advisor/dxp variants.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources