Skip to main content
Glama

HR: Get form response

hr_get_form_response
Read-only

Read one filled-in form by its ASSIGNMENT id — the answers, who filled it, who it was about, and when. Read-only. Returns {response: null} when the assignment is not visible to the caller or has not been submitted yet. An EXIT-survey answer set is withheld (answers redacted) from a caller whose HR role may not read exit surveys — the same boundary the person's timeline applies.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "assignment_id": "<assignment_id>"
    },
    "name": "hr_get_form_response"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
assignment_idYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Goes well beyond the readOnly/non-destructive annotations by disclosing that authorization or non-submission is surfaced as {response: null} rather than an error, and that EXIT-survey answers are redacted for callers whose HR role forbids them. These are exactly the silent-failure and data-boundary behaviors an agent needs before trusting an empty result.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three tight sentences: purpose first, then the null-return caveat, then the redaction boundary. Capitalized emphasis on ASSIGNMENT and EXIT marks the two distinctions that matter; nothing is restated from the annotations or schema.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter, no-output-schema read tool, the definition covers the returned fields, the empty case, and the redaction case. An agent could call it correctly and interpret a null without further information.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema is a bare untyped-semantics integer at 0% description coverage, so the description carries the load: it specifies that the id refers to an assignment (not a form, person, or application). It stops short of saying where to obtain such an id or confirming the integer format, which the schema supplies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Read one filled-in form') plus the exact key ('by its ASSIGNMENT id') and enumerates what comes back: answers, filler, subject, timestamp. The emphasis on ASSIGNMENT id distinguishes it from form-definition lookups and from the list tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Clear context for use: a single assignment by id, read-only, and the null-result condition when the assignment is invisible or unsubmitted. It does not name an alternative tool (e.g. the list-assignments path) for discovering ids or for bulk retrieval, so the agent must infer that routing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources