Skip to main content
Glama

Position bands per day

get_position_distribution
Read-onlyIdempotent

How the property's queries spread across position bands 1-3, 4-10, 11-20 and 21+ for each day (or week) of the period: number of queries, clicks, impressions and impression share per band. Each query's position for a day is its impression-weighted average that day. Also returns the period aggregate and the share shift between the first and the last week (sharePoints, percentage points). Use for "are we moving from page 2 to page 1", "how much visibility sits beyond position 10", or to see when a band changed. / Faixas de posição por dia ou semana, com deslocamento entre a primeira e a última semana.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
daysNoWindow length in days (default 28). Ignored when startDate and endDate are both given. / Janela em dias.
siteYesProperty: displayName ("example.com"), Search Console siteUrl ("sc-domain:example.com", "https://www.example.com/") or numeric id. A unique substring among visible properties also works ("exam"). list_sites shows the options. / Propriedade por nome, siteUrl ou id.
brandNoall (default); branded = only queries containing one of the property's branded_terms; non-branded = the rest. Needs branded terms set on the property in the Organiq panel, otherwise invalid_argument with the panel URL. / Marca × sem marca.
queryNoOnly queries containing this text, or a regex as /…/ (e.g. "/^how to/"; no flag = case-insensitive).
deviceNoDevice.
countryNoCountry as ISO-3166-1 alpha-3, as in Search Console: bra, usa, prt, arg.
endDateNoEnd yyyy-mm-dd. Default: last synced date of the property (Search Console lags ~3 days; never "today"). Every response states the period used. / Fim; padrão = última data sincronizada.
startDateNoStart yyyy-mm-dd. Default: endDate − (days − 1).
searchTypeNoSearch type (default web).
granularityNoday (default) or week (Monday as key).
pageContainsNoOnly pages whose URL contains this text (case-insensitive), e.g. "/blog/".

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly/idempotent/no-destructive, so the safety profile is covered; the description adds real methodological context beyond that — positions are impression-weighted daily averages, the response includes a period aggregate and a first-vs-last-week share shift in percentage points. It omits performance/cost traits, so not a 5.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Well front-loaded: the band definitions and metrics come first, then interpretation guidance, then the aggregate/share-shift note. The Portuguese mirror of the first sentence adds bulk without new information for an English-reading agent, costing it a point.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 11 parameters and no output schema, the description carries the return-shape burden and does so — it names the per-band metrics, the period aggregate, and the sharePoints shift. What remains unexplained (pagination, response envelope, default ordering) is minor for this read-only tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so every parameter (days, site, brand, query, device, country, dates, searchType, granularity, pageContains) is already documented in the schema. The description adds only the day/week framing, which is already in the granularity enum. Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific analytical operation on a specific resource, and enumerates the exact band boundaries (1-3, 4-10, 11-20, 21+) plus the metrics returned. An agent can distinguish this from get_timeseries or get_query_performance without opening the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides three concrete use cases in quotes ('are we moving from page 2 to page 1', 'how much visibility sits beyond position 10', 'when a band changed'), which gives the agent clear situational triggers. It stops short of naming an alternative sibling or stating when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.