Skip to main content
Glama

Ontario Protocol

by com.ontarioprotocol

Bazaar Buyer Intent Gap

bazaar_buyer_intent_gap
Read-onlyIdempotent

Free read-only provider audit that runs Coinbase's indexing preflight and measures one public x402 endpoint across five live CDP Bazaar buyer-search variations. Returns retrieval coverage, observed sample ranks, alternatives, public 30-day call and unique-payer observations, Base USDC price bands, HTTP 402 and metadata readiness, and the activation boundary. Public quality counts may include owner-funded calls and are not revenue. It never signs or settles.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
target_urlYesPublic x402 paid endpoint whose buyer visibility should be measured.
buyer_queryYesPublic task phrase a funded agent could use in CDP Bazaar search; never include credentials or private customer text.
buyer_queriesNoOptional explicit portfolio of up to five public buyer phrases. When omitted, Ontario generates four deterministic variants from buyer_query.

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses that the tool 'never signs or settles' (consistent with readOnlyHint), that 'public quality counts may include owner-funded calls and are not revenue', and that it runs a preflight check. This adds valuable behavioral context beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single dense paragraph that front-loads the core purpose, then efficiently lists return values and caveats without any wasted words. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having no output schema, the description enumerates all returned data points (retrieval coverage, sample ranks, alternatives, 30-day observations, price bands, HTTP 402 readiness, activation boundary) and caveats, making it complete for a read-only audit tool with rich annotations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides 100% coverage with descriptions for target_url, buyer_query, and buyer_queries, including the default behavior of generating variants. The description adds context about 'five live variations' but does not add syntax or format details beyond the schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies a specific verb ('audit') and resource ('public x402 endpoint'), and details the scope ('five live CDP Bazaar buyer-search variations'), distinguishing it from siblings like x402_readiness_verify by focusing on buyer intent gaps.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage as a preflight audit for measuring buyer visibility, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool over alternatives such as x402_readiness_verify or find_x402_tool. There is no exclusion or alternative guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Ontario Protocol toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

B3.3/5.0
Disambiguation3/5

Some tools have overlapping purposes, such as bazaar_buyer_intent_gap and x402_readiness_verify both performing audits, and ontario_list-service and x402_launch_kit both generating listing materials. However, the detailed descriptions clarify the distinct contexts, so an agent can generally tell them apart.

Naming Consistency2/5

Tool names mix snake_case (agent_can_pay), hyphenated (ontario_list-service), and inconsistent prefixes (x402_ vs ontario_). The verbs also vary widely (can_pay, find, list-service, refresh-listing, readiness_verify), making the naming pattern chaotic.

Tool Count4/5

With 8 tools, the count is within a reasonable range and each tool serves a distinct part of the x402 workflow. A few tools could potentially be merged (e.g., launch_kit as part of list-service), but the count is not excessive.

Completeness3/5

The core lifecycle of discovery, readiness verification, payment policy, listing, and refresh is covered. However, there is no tool for editing or deleting an existing listing, and the refresh tool explicitly cannot modify metadata, creating a notable gap in management capabilities.

Resources