Skip to main content
Glama

Kristo Intelligence — Base DeFi Signals (x402)

get_arbitrage_opportunities

Read-onlyIdempotent

Read-only operation — no side effects, no parameters. Returns live cross-DEX arbitrage spreads on Base, refreshed every 60 seconds. Use it for executable price gaps between venues; use get_market_stats for aggregate prices or get_trading_signal for directional calls.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "get_arbitrage_opportunities"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent and non-destructive, and the description redundantly restates the read-only/no-params point. It does add genuinely new behavioral context beyond the annotations: the data is live, scoped to Base, and refreshed every 60 seconds, which tells the agent about staleness.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences, front-loaded with scope then routing guidance. The opening read-only/no-params clause mostly duplicates annotations and schema, which is the only wasted wording.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter tool with a 60-second refresh cycle, the description covers scope, cadence, and alternatives. With no output schema, it could say more about what a spread record contains, but the essentials are present.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Zero parameters, so the baseline is 4; the description confirms 'no parameters', consistent with the empty schema with additionalProperties false.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Returns live cross-DEX arbitrage spreads on Base') plus scope qualifiers (chain, refresh cadence), and explicitly names the sibling tools it is not, so an agent can route without opening schemas.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives explicit when-to-use ('executable price gaps between venues') and names two alternatives with the conditions that select them (get_market_stats for aggregate prices, get_trading_signal for directional calls).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources