Skip to main content
Glama

Crypto, web, finance and app data tools

US Company Search

us_company_search

Find US-listed companies by name or ticker (e.g. 'nvidia', 'bank of america', 'TSLA'): ticker, exact SEC registrant name and CIK, best matches first. Use to resolve a company name before calling other SEC tools.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "q": "<q>"
    },
    "name": "us_company_search"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
qYes
limitNo

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. It discloses that results are best matches first and include exact SEC registrant names and CIKs, but it does not discuss matching behavior, ambiguity handling, or limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tight sentences with the core action, examples, return fields, and usage routing front-loaded. There is no wasted text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be fully described, though the description helpfully names key fields. The main gap is the undocumented 'limit' parameter and lack of detail about result count or matching behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It explains the query parameter well with name and ticker examples, but it does not mention the 'limit' parameter at all, leaving one of two parameters undocumented.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb and resource ('Find US-listed companies') and clearly differentiates this lookup/search from sibling tools like us_company_filings, fundamentals, and profile. It also states the returned identifiers (ticker, exact SEC registrant name, CIK) and ordering, so an agent can identify the tool without opening the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives a clear use case: resolve a company name before calling other SEC tools. This is useful routing guidance to the us_company_* siblings, but it does not explicitly state exclusions or what to do if the company is not US-listed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources