Skip to main content
Glama

Crypto, web, finance and app data tools

app_store_details

Details of an iPhone/iPad app on the Apple App Store by id or store URL: developer, rating, price, genre, version and update date. Use for app or competitor research.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "app": "<app>"
    },
    "name": "app_store_details"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
appYes
countryNous

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It usefully discloses that the lookup accepts either an id or a store URL and implies a read-only fetch, but it says nothing about storefront/region effects, missing-app behavior, or any rate limits or auth requirements.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tight sentences: the resource and returned fields come first, then the use case. No filler or redundant restatement of the tool name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return-value explanation is not strictly required, and the field list is a helpful bonus. The only real gap is the undocumented `country` parameter and its regional implications for a storefront-specific lookup.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description should compensate. It does explain the required `app` parameter (id or store URL), which the bare schema does not, but the `country` parameter — including its 'us' default and its effect on pricing/availability — is completely unaddressed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource (details of an iPhone/iPad app on the Apple App Store) and enumerates the returned fields, so the agent knows exactly what it retrieves. It does not explicitly contrast itself with the sibling app_store_search, leaving the search-vs-lookup distinction implicit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

"Use for app or competitor research" gives a usage context but no when-not guidance and never names app_store_search as the alternative for discovery. An agent must infer that this tool requires an already-known app id or URL and is not for finding apps.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources