Skip to main content
Glama

get_individual_assistance

Get FEMA Individual and Households Program (IHP) assistance data.

Returns aggregated data on individual assistance provided to disaster
survivors including housing assistance and other needs assistance.
Data is aggregated at the county level per disaster.

Args:
    disaster_number: FEMA disaster number to filter by (e.g. 4737).
    state: Two-letter US state abbreviation (e.g. 'CA', 'TX').
    limit: Maximum number of records to return (default 25, max 1000).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNo
stateNo
disaster_numberNo

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses that data is aggregated at the county level per disaster and includes housing and other needs assistance. It does not mention side effects, permissions, or rate limits, but as a data retrieval tool, the behavior is adequately transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is appropriately sized: a clear opening statement followed by a structured Args section. Every sentence adds value, with no fluff or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is complete for a simple retrieval tool. It explains the data type, aggregation level, and all parameters. An output schema exists, so return values need not be elaborated. The context and parameter details are sufficient for an agent to invoke the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, but the description compensates fully by explaining each parameter with examples (e.g., disaster number 4737, state abbreviation 'CA', limit default/max). This adds meaning beyond the bare schema, which only lists types and defaults.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly specifies the tool returns FEMA Individual and Households Program (IHP) assistance data, with a clear verb ('Get') and resource. It distinguishes itself from siblings by mentioning IHP and county-level aggregation, which sets it apart from public assistance or disaster declarations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor does it mention exclusions. However, the resource type (IHP assistance) makes the intended use clear, so usage is implied rather than explicitly guided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources