Skip to main content
Glama

Novarithm Agent Hub: trust and commerce checks

fx_huf_usd

[PAID $0.002 USDC/call, x402, eip155:8453] Official HUF/USD reference rate: latest European Central Bank fixing (or the official peg when USD is pegged), with the rate date, the method (direct, cross via EUR or peg-derived) and the source attribution. Deterministic, sourced, no estimate.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "fx_huf_usd"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries real behavioral weight: it discloses a per-call price ($0.002 USDC via x402 on eip155:8453), the data provenance (ECB fixing), a fallback behavior (official peg when USD is pegged), and that results are deterministic and non-estimated. What is missing is timing/freshness specifics (when the fixing is published, staleness behavior) and what happens when no fixing exists.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two dense sentences with no filler, and the payment/protocol cost is front-loaded ahead of the data description, which is the right priority for a paid endpoint. The bracket prefix is slightly noisy but every element in it (price, protocol, chain id) is actionable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description adequately covers the return payload by naming the rate, rate date, derivation method, and attribution. Remaining gaps are minor operational ones (fixing publication time, error behavior for non-quoted pairs).

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes no parameters, so there is nothing for the description to disambiguate at the input level. Baseline 4 applies; the description correctly does not waste space restating an empty schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States the exact resource with source and semantics: "Official HUF/USD reference rate: latest European Central Bank fixing". The pair, the authority, and the fact that it is a reference rate rather than an estimate make it trivially distinguishable from the other fx_* siblings such as fx_convert or fx_latest.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied rather than stated: an agent needing the HUF/USD rate or an ECB-sourced value will recognize it, and "no estimate" signals the authoritative-data use case. However, it never explicitly contrasts itself with fx_convert, fx_latest, or fx_usd_huf (the inverse pair), nor states when it should be avoided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.