Skip to main content
Glama

List quick replies

list_quick_replies
Read-only

⚡ MENSAGENS RÁPIDAS — Lista as mensagens rápidas do Chat (as que o operador insere digitando "/" no campo de mensagem): as pessoais da conta + as da equipe. Servem só com a janela de 24h ABERTA (texto livre); para janela fechada use templates (list_whatsapp_templates).

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "list_quick_replies"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
target_user_idNoID da conta-alvo (opcional; APENAS o admin da plataforma pode usar). Padrão: a conta autenticada.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover the safety profile (readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, openWorldHint=false). The description adds genuinely useful context beyond that: the 24h-window constraint and that the result merges personal plus team quick replies, while the schema flags that target_user_id is admin-only. Minor gaps: no mention of ordering or result size.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the verb and resource, followed by the definition and the window constraint. Slightly verbose with emoji and full-caps emphasis, but every sentence, including the template cross-reference, earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only list tool with no output schema, the definition supplies what matters: what is returned, the eligibility window, and where to go otherwise. Only return-format/pagination details are absent, which is acceptable here.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the single optional parameter already documents its default and admin-only restriction. The description adds nothing about target_user_id, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource (list quick replies) and defines what they are: quick messages the operator inserts by typing '/' in the message field, covering both personal and team entries. This makes it clearly distinguishable from list_whatsapp_templates in the sibling set.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states the condition for use — free text requires the 24h window to be OPEN — and names the alternative for the closed-window case: list_whatsapp_templates. The agent is routed without inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources