Skip to main content
Glama

List authoritative logic versions

list_room_logic
Read-only

Returns the deploy history (version, tickRate, bytes, deployedAt) for a room's authoritative logic, newest first.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "roomName": "<roomName>"
    },
    "name": "list_room_logic"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
gameNoWhich game to act on: its publishable key (pk_…) or its exact name. Defaults to the x-mp-game header, then your primary game.
roomNameYesThe room name.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already establish that this is a read-only, non-open-world operation. The description adds useful behavioral detail by naming returned fields and specifying 'newest first' ordering, though it does not discuss pagination limits or whether the full history is always returned.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The definition is a single efficient sentence with no wasted text. The core purpose and return shape are front-loaded, and the newest-first ordering is included compactly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only listing tool with complete parameter documentation and safety annotations, the description provides the key return fields and ordering. It could be more complete by mentioning pagination or whether history length is capped, but the essential information is present.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already defines both parameters, including the game fallback behavior and roomName. The description does not add parameter-specific meaning beyond what the schema provides, which meets the baseline for fully documented parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb, 'Returns,' and a precise resource, 'deploy history for a room's authoritative logic.' It also lists returned fields and ordering, making it clearly distinguishable from mutation-oriented siblings like deploy_room_logic and rollback_room_logic.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use the tool by stating it returns deploy history, but it does not explicitly name alternatives or state when not to use it. There is no guidance about choosing this over related tools such as get_room_logs or rollback_room_logic.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.