list_updatesList the most recent Multilo changelog entries — shipped features, improvements and fixes, newest first. Use when asked what is new, whether something has shipped, or how recently the product changed.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | How many updates to return (1-50). Defaults to 10. |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It adds behavioral context like 'newest first' and content scope ('shipped features, improvements and fixes'). However, it does not disclose potential side effects, permissions, or error behavior, which is a moderate gap for a tool without annotation support.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two sentences, front-loaded with the purpose and followed by usage guidance. Every word earns its place; there is no fluff or redundancy.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with one optional parameter and no output schema, the description provides sufficient context: it states what is listed, the ordering, and when to use it. The simple nature of the tool means no further detail is necessary.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema description coverage is 100%, and the limit parameter is fully described in the schema. The tool description does not add additional parameter semantics beyond what the schema already provides, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool lists the most recent Multilo changelog entries with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings (get_page, search_docs) by focusing on updates/changelog rather than page retrieval or search.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description explicitly states when to use the tool ('Use when asked what is new, whether something has shipped, or how recently the product changed'). It does not mention when-not-to-use or name alternatives, but the guidance is clear enough for a simple list tool.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Each tool serves a distinct purpose: fetching any page, listing changelog entries, and searching documentation. There is minimal overlap since get_page is generic while search_docs is specifically for locating docs.
All tool names follow a clear verb_noun pattern: get_page, list_updates, search_docs. The naming style is uniform and predictable.
Three tools is on the smaller side but appropriate for a focused server exposing Multilo's web content. Each tool has a clear role, and the count feels neither excessive nor trivial.
The tool set covers the main use cases: accessing pages, checking updates, and searching docs. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no dedicated tool to list all docs pages), but agents can work around them using get_page.