Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose mutation behavior. It says the tool gives a payout and needs a UUID requestId, but does not explain whether harvesting consumes the plot, whether the action is reversible, how the payout is determined, or what happens if the plot is not ready.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences and front-loads the core action and outcome. It is efficiently sized, though the second sentence omits the required plotId despite listing requestId.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no annotations, no output schema, and 0% schema description coverage, the description is too sparse for a two-parameter mutation tool. It does not define 'ready', explain plotId, clarify requestId's idempotency purpose, or describe the mutation's side effects.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description should compensate. It mentions only requestId and repeats its UUID format, while failing to explain the required plotId parameter at all, leaving both parameters poorly documented.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: harvesting a ready plot, with the outcome of receiving a KBUX payout. It is clear enough to distinguish from siblings like plant or water, but it does not explicitly name alternatives or clarify how it differs from garden_status or other plot-related tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'ready plot' implies a precondition for use, and the requestId requirement is mentioned, but there is no explicit guidance on when to harvest versus checking garden_status, watering, or planting. No exclusions or alternative tools are named.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.