Skip to main content
Glama

Read a stakeholder profile

get_stakeholder
Read-onlyIdempotent

Read one published Blossom stakeholder profile using its slug from search. Returns public profile context and its canonical source link, without contact fields, internal editorial notes or unpublished records.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "slug": "<slug>"
    },
    "name": "get_stakeholder"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
slugYes

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover read-only, idempotent, non-destructive, and closed-world behavior, so the description adds value by disclosing what is deliberately withheld: contact fields, internal editorial notes, and unpublished records. It also mentions the canonical source link in the response, which is useful behavioral framing. It stops short of describing not-found or error behavior for an invalid slug.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, front-loaded with the operation and the input's provenance, then the return contract. No filler or redundant restatement of the title.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a one-parameter read tool with an output schema covering return values, the description supplies what the schema cannot: published-only scope, slug provenance, and excluded fields. Only error/not-found behavior is left unaddressed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description carries the burden of explaining the single parameter. It does say the slug identifies a published profile and comes from search, but adds no format hints (length, casing, slug vs. display name) beyond what the bare string schema states.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

"Read one published Blossom stakeholder profile using its slug" gives a specific verb, resource, and cardinality, and scopes it to published records only. The phrase "slug from search" distinguishes it from search_stakeholders, which produces the slug rather than consuming it.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description tells the agent the required input comes from a prior search call and that only published profiles are retrievable, which is clear usage context. It stops short of explicitly naming search_stakeholders as the feeder tool or stating what to do when a slug is unknown.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources