Skip to main content
Glama

Get part

get_part
Read-onlyIdempotent

One part in full: its pins with their directions, its settings with ranges and units, and how a Mokxi template wires it.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "type": "<type>"
    },
    "name": "get_part"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
typeYesThe part type, such as "led" or "hcsr04".

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already establish read-only, idempotent, non-destructive, closed-world behavior. The description adds valuable return-content context by naming pins, directions, settings, ranges, units, and template wiring, though it does not mention error or not-found behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single front-loaded sentence with a colon-delimited list of returned details. It is compact and every phrase contributes useful scope information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter retrieval tool with rich annotations and no output schema, the description is largely complete because it explains the returned data categories. It omits error behavior and explicit routing relative to search_parts, which keeps it from a 5.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the single 'type' parameter is fully documented with examples such as 'led' and 'hcsr04'. The description adds no further constraints or accepted-value detail beyond what the schema provides, so the high-coverage baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies a single-part retrieval and specifies the detail returned: pins with directions, settings with ranges and units, and template wiring. It does not explicitly distinguish this from the sibling search_parts tool, so it stops short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by 'One part in full,' suggesting this is for fetching complete details of a known part type. There is no explicit guidance on when to use this instead of search_parts or how to handle unknown part types.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources