get_setlist
Goose setlist for a given date (YYYY-MM-DD).
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| date | Yes | ||
| include_related | No |
Goose setlist for a given date (YYYY-MM-DD).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| date | Yes | ||
| include_related | No |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, so the description carries full burden. It discloses the function but does not mention any behavioral traits such as read-only status, error handling, or rate limits.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single sentence that is front-loaded with the key verb and resource. No unnecessary words, though it could expand slightly on usage.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no output schema, no annotations, and minimal parameter descriptions, the description leaves significant gaps about return format, error conditions, and related tool suggestions.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, so description must compensate. It clarifies the 'date' parameter format but entirely omits any explanation for 'include_related'.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the band (Goose), resource (setlist), and required input format (YYYY-MM-DD). It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like album_info or search_shows.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like search_shows or latest_show. The description only specifies the date format.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.