Skip to main content
Glama

MIDAS CIVIL NX tools (MIDAS IT Europe)

Remove the thermal loads

bridge_thermal_remove
Destructive

Removes what the Bridge Thermal Loads plugin writes: every load case whose name starts with EC1T_ (also named sets and ones the plugin window wrote) and all temperature loads in them, on any element. Other load cases are not touched. An undo record is kept, so bridge_thermal_undo can put them back. Previews unless apply: true.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "bridge_thermal_remove"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
applyNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark this as destructive, and the description adds meaningful detail: which load cases are removed, that named sets and plugin-window-written sets are included, that all temperature loads on any element are removed, and that an undo record is kept. This is exactly the kind of behavioral context an agent needs before invoking a destructive operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the core action and scope, then adds exclusions, undo behavior, and the apply flag in a compact sequence. Every sentence carries useful information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter destructive tool with no output schema, the description covers scope, exclusions, undo, and the preview/apply distinction completely. Nothing needed to call it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The only parameter is apply, whose schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must carry the semantics. It does: previews by default, mutates only when apply is true.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: it removes load cases written by the Bridge Thermal Loads plugin, specifically those whose names start with EC1T_, along with their temperature loads. It also explicitly scopes what is not touched, making it easy to distinguish from the apply, calc, read, and undo siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It clearly explains the preview-by-default behavior and the role of bridge_thermal_undo as the recovery alternative. It also states that other load cases are not touched, giving the agent enough information to choose this tool without opening the schema.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources