Mellow Mountain Radio

Hiking Trails

get_hiking_trails

Read-onlyIdempotent

Sedona hiking trail guide — distance, elevation gain, difficulty, trailhead location, Red Rock Pass requirement, access restrictions (shuttle/permit), and pro tips for 15 of the best trails in Red Rock Country.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`trail`	No	Trail name keyword, e.g. 'devil' or 'cathedral' — omit for all trails
`difficulty`	No	Filter by difficulty

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`total`	No
`source`	No
`trails`	Yes
`kazm_note`	No
`shuttle_info`	No
`oak_creek_tip`	No
`red_rock_pass_required`	No

TDQS

A4.3/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and openWorldHint=true, so the description adds value by specifying the geographic scope (Sedona, Red Rock Country), the number of trails (15), and the types of information provided (pass requirements, restrictions, pro tips). This context enhances behavioral transparency beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, information-dense sentence that front-loads the purpose. Every word adds value, with no redundancy or fluff. It efficiently communicates the tool's scope and content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema and rich annotations, the description adequately covers the tool's purpose, the type of data returned, and its geographic focus. No critical gaps are evident for a lookup tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for both parameters ('trail' and 'difficulty'). The description mentions 'trail name keyword' and 'difficulty filter' but does not add new semantic meaning beyond what the schema already provides. Baseline 3 is appropriate as the schema carries the load.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool is a 'Sedona hiking trail guide' and lists specific attributes provided (distance, elevation, difficulty, trailhead, pass requirement, restrictions, tips). The verb 'get' aligns with the tool name, and it distinguishes from siblings like get_jeep_trails by focusing on hiking trails.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for hiking trail information in Sedona's Red Rock Country, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives such as get_jeep_trails or get_photography_guide. The context of sibling tools makes it clear, but explicit guidance is missing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Mellow Mountain Radio tools Inspect

Try in Browser

RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

B3.4/5.0

Disambiguation3/5

Many tools have distinct purposes, but there is overlap in areas like listener management (get_listener_profile, get_or_create_listener, register_listener, update_listener_preference, log_listener_history) and alerts (get_emergency_alerts, get_nws_alerts, get_fire_restrictions, get_wildfire_perimeters). This can cause confusion for an agent selecting the appropriate tool.

Naming Consistency3/5

Tool names mostly follow a verb_noun pattern, but verbs are inconsistent: 'get_', 'search_', 'submit_', 'log_', 'update_', 'register_', 'get_or_create_'. The listener management tools have varying verbs, and there is a mix of specific and generic names. The pattern is readable but not fully consistent.

Tool Count2/5

At 45 tools, the server is overloaded for its stated purpose as a radio station. It covers many unrelated domains (emergency alerts, hiking, chakras, etc.), which would be better split into separate, focused servers. The tool count feels excessive and unfocused.

Completeness2/5

While the radio-related tools (now playing, requests, schedule, listener management) cover core functionality, the inclusion of many unrelated tools (e.g., hiking trails, chakras, sports scores) dilutes the server's purpose. There are obvious gaps in radio-specific features (e.g., no tool for playlist management or DJ scheduling) but an overabundance of peripheral tools.

Resources

Need Help?