create_session
Create a new interactive session for any calculator and return the session URL
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| metadata | No | Optional session metadata | |
| calculator | Yes | Calculator slug |
Create a new interactive session for any calculator and return the session URL
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| metadata | No | Optional session metadata | |
| calculator | Yes | Calculator slug |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must disclose side effects. It implies creating a session but doesn't state resource lifetime, authentication requirements, or failure modes. No mention that sessions are interactive and must be closed with close_session.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, direct, front-loaded with verb and object. No unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema, so description should detail return format. It only says 'session URL' without specifying structure. No mention of how to use the URL or whether calculator must be valid. Sibling tools like list_calculators and close_session indicate related context missing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema covers both parameters with descriptions, so baseline is 3. Description adds no additional parameter meaning beyond the schema's 'Calculator slug' and 'Optional session metadata'.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Specific verb 'create', resource 'interactive session', and outcome 'session URL'. Clearly distinct from sibling tools like calculate or close_session.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like calculate_cas or generate_prefilled_url. No mention of prerequisites such as needing an existing calculator.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
calculate_cas and calculate_cas_headless are explicitly aliases, creating two tools for the same purpose. Also, calculate and generate_prefilled_url both produce prefilled URLs, so their boundaries are not fully distinct.
Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (calculate, create_session, get_session_state, list_calculators). The main deviation is calculate_cas_headless, which still fits the pattern but is an awkward alias name.
The 10-tool count is reasonable for a calculator service with session management. However, the alias tool is redundant and could be removed without losing functionality.
The tool set covers listing calculators, getting schemas, running calculations (standard and CAS), managing sessions, and generating URLs. Minor gaps like a dedicated way to delete sessions are addressed by close_session, so coverage is adequate.