Skip to main content
Glama

MCC Solutions

Work with MCC Solutions

join_network
Read-onlyIdempotent

For someone looking for notary, loan signing agent, process server, court runner, apostille runner or remote bookkeeper work: the roles MCC Solutions is recruiting for and the application page for their state.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "join_network"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
stateNoThe person's state, name or two-letter code (optional)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

B3.3/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare this as a safe, idempotent, closed-world read, so the safety profile needs no restating. The description adds that results are state-scoped and include an application page, which is useful beyond the annotations. It does not say what happens when the optional state is omitted, which is the main behavioral unknown for a lookup tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is a single sentence with no filler, so length is fine. But the structure buries the action in a long 'For someone looking for...' preamble and never states a verb, making it slower to parse than a front-loaded 'Get X for a state' phrasing would be.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a one-optional-param read-only lookup with no output schema, the description covers what is returned at a high level and who it is for. It is not complete on the two things an agent would still wonder about: behavior with no state supplied and whether an out-of-scope state yields empty results or a redirect.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% for the single parameter, and the schema already documents that state accepts a name or two-letter code. The description only alludes to state scoping ('the application page for their state') without adding fallback or default semantics. Baseline 3 applies since the schema carries the parameter burden.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names the resource concretely – the roles MCC Solutions is recruiting for plus the application page for a state – and lists the specific job types (notary, loan signing agent, process server, court runner, apostille runner, remote bookkeeper). That is enough to distinguish it from siblings like career_and_student_services or apply_as_vendor. It stops short of a clean verb-first statement, phrasing everything as 'for someone looking for...'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The opening audience framing ('For someone looking for notary, loan signing agent...') implicitly tells the agent when this tool fits, which is more than nothing. However, there is no explicit when-not guidance and no naming of the closest alternatives (career_and_student_services, apply_as_vendor) to route between them.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources