Liste les services de mastering de MB Mastering (mastering stéréo, stems, à distance, gravure vinyle, numérisation, formation) avec leurs tarifs et descriptions.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, but the description indicates a read-only listing operation without detailing any side effects, authentication needs, or response structure.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that efficiently conveys the tool's purpose and scope without any fluff.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no parameters and no output schema, the description sufficiently explains what the tool returns, though it could mention that it is read-only or give example output.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With zero parameters, the schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 4. The description adds no parameter details, but none are needed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description explicitly states the tool lists MB Mastering's services with their prices and descriptions, providing a specific verb and resource that distinguishes it from siblings like get_pricing and get_faq.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage for retrieving service listings but does not specify when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as get_pricing or send_quote_request.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Each tool serves a distinct purpose: search/fetch for content, get_* for info categories, and quote-related tools for requests/admin. Minor overlap exists between get_pricing and get_services, which both mention tariffs, but they are otherwise clearly differentiated.
Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (get_faq, get_pricing, send_quote_request, prepare_quote_email), but 'fetch' and 'search' are bare verbs that deviate from the get_* style. All names are lowercase snake_case, so consistency is mostly preserved.
With 8 tools, the server is well-scoped for a studio information and quote integration. Each tool adds value without redundancy, and the count is within the ideal range.
The server covers all core needs: searching and retrieving content, accessing service/pricing/FAQ/studio info, requesting quotes, and preparing admin emails. No major dead ends or missing operations for the apparent domain.