Skip to main content
Glama

Search Marketplace listings

search_public_listings
Read-only

Search pins ACROSS THE OPEN MARKETPLACE — the pins of every publicly published map on MappaIQ, not just this account. Use it for questions like 'what land is publicly listed under $2M around Rockwall' or 'show me every public retail listing'. Each hit is attributed to its map and owner (with the map's public page link); licensedBroker:true means MappaIQ checked the owner's TREC license, so say 'Licensed broker'. Filter by keyword (name/address/notes/city), assetClass, price and acreage ranges, or restrict to one public map with publicMapId (from list_public_maps). Returns EVERY pin on every public map, with every field as the owner stored it (name, address, price, size, notes, custom fields, etc.) plus the Listing broker's name and brokerage — because publishing a map makes the whole map public. Brokers label fields inconsistently, so the marketplace understands synonyms: size columns named SF / Sq Ft / Size / Available, price named Asking / List Price, land named Acres / Lot Size are all normalized into clean price / buildingSF / acreage / offerType / assetClass fields you can filter on (the broker's original columns are kept too). confirmedDaysAgo gives the age of a pin's Confirmed date, or null when it was never dated. One result per property: when several Accounts list the same property (a Co-listing), the most recently confirmed one's fields come first, offers says who offers what ("For sale (A) · For lease (B)") and listedBy gives each broker with the pin id for get_public_listing. No phone or email: get them with get_public_listing. 50 per page.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoPage size. Default and max 50.
offsetNoSkip this many matches (paging). Default 0.
contextYesExplain in 15-25 words, in third person, why this tool is called and how it supports the user's goal. For analytics only. You MUST describe only the abstract purpose of the tool call. NEVER include, repeat, paraphrase, or infer personal, sensitive, or identifying information from the user request or tool results, including names, emails, phone numbers, IPs, IDs, or credentials. You MUST generalize specific entities into roles such as "a user", "the customer", or "an account". Example: "Retrieving a customer's recent orders to investigate a billing issue and help support determine the appropriate resolution."
keywordNoFree-text match on name, address, notes, city, market fields.
maxSqftNoMaximum building size in square feet.
minSqftNoMinimum building size in square feet.
maxPriceNo
minPriceNo
llm_modelYesThe exact model identifier you (the assistant) are running as, taken from your system prompt or environment (e.g. "claude-opus-4-8", "gpt-5.2"). Used for analytics only. If you do not know your model identifier with certainty, pass "unknown" — never guess.
assetClassNoLand, Retail, Multifamily, Office, Industrial, etc.
maxAcreageNo
minAcreageNo
publicMapIdNoRestrict to one public map (mapId from list_public_maps).
conversation_idNoPass the exact conversation_id from the server's previous response, unchanged. The server provides it on the first call — never invent one, and do not issue parallel tool calls until you have it. Keep passing the same conversation_id for the rest of the conversation, including after later user messages or on a different task; do not reset it when the user starts a new request.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only declare readOnly/non-destructive, but the description adds substantial behavior: full-map exposure ('publishing a map makes the whole map public'), field normalization with broker synonym handling, confirmedDaysAgo semantics (null when undated), co-listing dedup rules, and the explicit absence of phone/email. This is well beyond what structured fields provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The purpose and scope are front-loaded, and each clause carries substantive information (dedup, normalization, pagination). The sentences are long and dense, packing several distinct behaviors per sentence, so it reads as a wall of text rather than crisply structured guidance.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a 14-parameter tool with no output schema, the description compensates thoroughly: it describes the return shape (all fields as stored, normalized fields, attribution, listedBy, offers), pagination (50/page), and the contact-data gap. Nothing an agent needs to call or interpret results correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 71% schema coverage, the schema documents most params, but the description adds real meaning: keyword matches name/address/notes/city, publicMapId comes from list_public_maps, and the price/acreage/assetClass filters map onto normalized fields. It does not explain limit/offset or the analytics-only params, which the schema already covers.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource ('Search pins ACROSS THE OPEN MARKETPLACE') and immediately scopes it against siblings: 'the pins of every publicly published map on MappaIQ, not just this account.' An agent can distinguish it from search_comps, find_listings, and list_public_maps without opening any schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives concrete triggering examples ('what land is publicly listed under $2M around Rockwall') and routes to the right siblings for follow-ups: list_public_maps for publicMapId and get_public_listing for phone/email. It stops short of an explicit when-not-to-use statement (e.g. 'use find_listings for your own account's pins'), leaving that boundary implied.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources