Skip to main content
Glama

YouCam for Creators

by com.makeupar

Ai Video Enhancer

AI-Video-Enhancer

The AI Video Enhance API enables developers to automatically improve video quality with minimal effort. It uses advanced AI processing to fix blur, adjust sharpness, optimize brightness, and upscale low resolution footage. With a simple API call, videos can be transformed from low-res footage and old videos into clean and clear HD quality. This solution is designed for fast integration and does not require prior experience in video editing or machine learning. It is ideal for applications that handle user generated content, media platforms, marketing tools, and content automation systems. Core Capabilities

  1. Blur correction The API detects motion blur and soft details, then reconstructs sharper frames using AI enhancement models.

  2. Sharpness optimization Edges and textures are enhanced to create a more defined and visually crisp video.

  3. Brightness and exposure adjustment Lighting inconsistencies are automatically corrected to improve visibility and color balance.

  4. AI upscaling Resolution is intelligently increased from lower quality formats such as 480p to HD quality while preserving details.

  5. Quality boosting Noise reduction and artifact removal are applied to produce clean and professional results. Sample usage cases:

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pollingNoIf true (default), keep polling until the task finishes, returning the final result. If false, return immediately without waiting for the task to finish.
requestYes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate readOnlyHint=false (write operation) and destructiveHint=false, and the description does not contradict these. However, it does not disclose the asynchronous/polling behavior suggested by the 'polling' parameter, nor does it mention potential side effects like processing time or costs. The description adds some capability detail but misses critical behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is long and contains marketing-style fluff ('does not require prior experience', 'fast integration') that adds little operational value. It ends with 'Sample usage cases:' without providing examples, suggesting truncated or incomplete content. The bullet list of capabilities is redundant with the opening paragraph.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description lacks important contextual details: it does not mention that the video file must be publicly accessible, that the task may be asynchronous, or that a dst_duration is required. The output schema exists, so return values are not needed, but prerequisites and workflow are missing. The truncated ending further reduces completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 50%, with the 'request' object lacking a direct description. The description does not compensate by explaining how to choose between src_file_url and src_file_id, or clarify the required dst_duration. It only mentions capabilities, not parameter semantics, so the agent must rely entirely on schema descriptions, which are incomplete.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: automatically improve video quality via AI, with specific capabilities like blur correction, sharpness adjustment, brightness optimization, and upscaling. It uses specific verbs and names the resource (video), and distinguishes itself from sibling tools like AI-Color-Correction or AI-Video-Style-Transfer by focusing on overall enhancement.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear usage context: ideal for user-generated content, media platforms, marketing tools, and content automation systems. It gives a sense of when to use the tool but does not explicitly mention alternatives or exclusions, which is acceptable given that the capability set is distinct from siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All YouCam for Creators toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

C2.4/5.0
Disambiguation3/5

Many tools are clearly distinct (e.g., AI-Object-Removal-Pro vs AI-Replace), but there is notable overlap among upload-related tools (File-Upload, Get-Upload-API-Info, upload_file) and among photo enhancement tools (Enhance, Color-Correction, Lighting) that could cause misselection. Template-listing tools are repetitive but each is tied to a specific generator.

Naming Consistency2/5

Naming conventions are inconsistent: some tools use PascalCase with dashes (AI-Avatar-Generator), some use verb-first patterns (Get-Feature-Cost, Get-Running-Task-Status), and one uses lowercase snake_case (upload_file). The AI- prefix is consistent for many tools, but the overall pattern is mixed.

Tool Count2/5

With 34 tools, the server feels overloaded. Many tools are variants of similar operations (e.g., numerous template listing tools) and could be consolidated or eliminated. The count exceeds the 25+ threshold for 'too many'.

Completeness4/5

The tool surface covers a broad range of AI media editing operations: photo and video generation, enhancement, background editing, face swap, object removal, and upload/status management. Minor gaps like video background removal (only replacement available) exist, but core workflows are well-supported.

Resources