delete_domain
Delete a custom domain and every inbox and message on it. Irreversible.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| domain_id | Yes | Domain id (uuid) from create_domain or list_domains. |
Delete a custom domain and every inbox and message on it. Irreversible.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| domain_id | Yes | Domain id (uuid) from create_domain or list_domains. |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description discloses the destructive behavior: deletion of domain, all inboxes, and messages, plus irreversibility. This is good but could detail potential impacts like webhook breakage.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, concise sentence conveys the essential information without waste. Front-loaded with verb and resource.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple delete operation, the description covers scope and irreversibility. Lacks details on error cases or prerequisites, but is complete enough for typical use.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 100% coverage with a description for domain_id. The tool description adds no additional parameter meaning, so baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Delete a custom domain and every inbox and message on it. Irreversible.' It uses a specific verb and resource, and distinguishes from siblings like create_domain or verify_domain by noting the cascading delete.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies use for removing a domain entirely, but lacks explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance. No alternatives or prerequisites are mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.