Skip to main content
Glama

Loker Dollar Jobs

get_job

Fetch a single active job by id. Returns basic job fields + an apply URL.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesJob id, e.g. `job_8f2a1c` (from a search_jobs result's `id`).
localeNoid | en (default id).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed5 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / id
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Job id, e.g. `job_8f2a1c` (from a search_jobs result's `id`).",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • removedInput schema / properties / include_region_locked
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "Default false. When true, return the job even if it is region-locked away from Indonesia; read `indonesiaEligibility` on the result.",
      -  "type": "boolean"
      -}
    • removedInput schema / properties / job_id
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "Job id from a search_jobs result.",
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • addedInput schema / properties / locale
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "id | en (default id).",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • changedInput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "job_id"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "id"
      +]
  2. First observed

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the disclosure burden, and it does add useful signals: the lookup is restricted to 'active' jobs and the response includes basic fields plus an apply URL. It stops short of stating behavior for missing/expired ids, errors, auth needs, or rate limits, which matters for an unannotated tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no filler, with the core operation front-loaded and the return shape appended as secondary information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple two-parameter read tool with no output schema, the description covers what it does and roughly what comes back, which is sufficient to call it correctly. The gaps are minor: locale is unmentioned and the 'active only' constraint's consequence for non-active ids is left unstated.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so both parameters are already documented, including the id format and its provenance from search_jobs results. The description adds nothing beyond 'by id' and never mentions the optional locale parameter. Baseline 3 applies when the schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource with scope: fetch a single active job by id. This implicitly separates it from the discovery-oriented sibling search_jobs, but it never names that sibling or any other alternative explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is only implied by the phrase 'by id' — an agent can infer this is the follow-up call once it has a job id. There is no explicit when-to-use, when-not-to-use, and no alternative named among the eleven siblings such as search_jobs.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources