Returns the parent's personal iCal feed URL — subscribe in Google/Apple/Outlook Calendar to see practices + games in your normal calendar app. Refreshes hourly.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description correctly identifies the tool as returning a URL (read-only) and mentions that the feed refreshes hourly. This is a key behavioral trait. It does not cover authentication requirements, but the name prefix 'parent_' implies authenticated access, which is acceptable. No contradictions with annotations (none provided).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description consists of two sentences, both front-loaded: the first sentence states the core purpose and output, the second provides additional behavioral detail (refresh rate). No extraneous text, every sentence earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (no parameters, no output schema), the description is fully complete. It covers what the tool returns, its purpose, how to use it (subscribe in calendar apps), and a key behavior (hourly refresh). No gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has no parameters, so there is nothing to explain. Per calibration baseline for 0 parameters, a score of 4 is appropriate since the description does not need to add parameter semantics.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool returns the parent's personal iCal feed URL for subscribing to calendar events (practices and games). It uses specific verbs ('returns', 'subscribe') and resource ('iCal feed URL'), distinguishing it from sibling tools like parent_my_upcoming_events which list events in-app.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
It explains when to use the tool (to see practices/games in a normal calendar app via subscription) and mentions compatible calendars (Google/Apple/Outlook). However, it does not explicitly state when not to use it or provide alternatives like parent_my_upcoming_events, which might be used for a one-time view without subscription.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Tools are clearly grouped by prefix (admin_, daycare_, org_, parent_) and within each group have distinct, non-overlapping purposes. For example, parent_add_kid vs parent_remove_kid are unambiguous.
All tools follow a consistent snake_case pattern with role prefix and action_noun structure. Minor exceptions like 'nearby_programs' are standalone and do not disrupt the overall consistency.
With 72 tools, this is far beyond the typical well-scoped range of 3-15. While the tools cover multiple user roles, the count is excessive and likely overwhelming for an agent, falling into the 'too many' category.
The tool set covers most core workflows for parents, orgs, and admins, but notable gaps exist: there is no tool to create a program or daycare, and admin tools for approving pending claims or discoveries are missing, leaving dead ends.
