Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds behavioral insight beyond the schema by explaining the effect on the stale-nudge timer, which is helpful given no annotations are provided. It does not detail all side effects but is adequate for a simple confirmation action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, focused sentence that front-loads the main action and outcome with no unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, no output schema), the description covers the essential purpose and effect completely, leaving no critical gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description does not explicitly describe the program_id parameter, but the parameter name and tool context make its purpose clear. With 0% schema description coverage, the description partially compensates due to simplicity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses specific verb 'Confirm' and resource 'program listing', clearly indicating the action of verifying accuracy and resetting a timer, which differentiates it from sibling tools like org_update_program or org_archive_program.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context for when to use the tool (to confirm accuracy and reset stale-nudge timer), but does not explicitly state when not to use it or mention alternatives, though the context is strong.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.