admin_search_trends
Top parent search queries in the last 30d. Reads parent_search_queries.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No |
Top parent search queries in the last 30d. Reads parent_search_queries.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries the full burden. It states 'Reads parent_search_queries', implying read-only behavior, but does not disclose authentication requirements, permission levels, rate limits, or whether the data is cached. The behavioral disclosure is minimal.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence, efficient and to the point. It front-loads the key information. However, it could be slightly more structured (e.g., separate param info) without losing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no annotations, no output schema, and only one parameter, the description should provide more context about return values, sorting, whether 'top' means most frequent, and data freshness. It mentions 'last 30d' but omits important contextual details like if admin privileges are required.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, meaning the description should explain the 'limit' parameter, but it does not mention it at all. The description only says 'top parent search queries' without noting that results can be limited via the optional parameter. The schema provides min/max but no purpose.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the tool retrieves 'top parent search queries in the last 30d' and 'reads parent_search_queries'. The verb 'reads' and resource 'top parent search queries' are specific. Among siblings, this is the only tool with 'trends' in the name, so it distinguishes well, though it could be more explicit about its admin-only nature.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention when it is appropriate or inappropriate to use, nor does it provide context about prerequisites or comparison with sibling tools like admin_cost_summary or admin_live_activity.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Tools are clearly grouped by prefix (admin_, daycare_, org_, parent_) and within each group have distinct, non-overlapping purposes. For example, parent_add_kid vs parent_remove_kid are unambiguous.
All tools follow a consistent snake_case pattern with role prefix and action_noun structure. Minor exceptions like 'nearby_programs' are standalone and do not disrupt the overall consistency.
With 72 tools, this is far beyond the typical well-scoped range of 3-15. While the tools cover multiple user roles, the count is excessive and likely overwhelming for an agent, falling into the 'too many' category.
The tool set covers most core workflows for parents, orgs, and admins, but notable gaps exist: there is no tool to create a program or daycare, and admin tools for approving pending claims or discoveries are missing, leaving dead ends.