Skip to main content
Glama

Spain Legal by Legal Fournier

Explain NIE Process

explain_nie_process
Read-onlyIdempotent

Return the stable NIE and TIE workflow, the key procedural distinctions, and the canonical process resource for agents.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
formsYesRelevant forms and administrative references.
stepsYesOrdered process steps.
summaryYesShort overview of the NIE/TIE process.
referencesYesSecondary Legal Fournier references.
next_actionsYesNext actions to progress the procedure.
review_levelYesHow much human review is still advisable before treating the result as filing-ready.
decision_traceYesStructured trace of the procedural distinctions that matter.
common_mistakesYesCommon mistakes in NIE/TIE processing.
key_distinctionsYesKey distinctions that agents should preserve.
key_rules_appliedYesStable procedural rules applied by the tool.
related_resource_urisYesCanonical MCP resources an agent can read next without leaving the server.
official_legal_sourcesYesOfficial legal and administrative sources anchoring the procedure.
suggested_follow_up_toolsYesTool calls that are likely to advance the analysis.
current_verification_flagsYesLive-verification warnings for office-level or fee-level volatility.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / suggested_follow_up_tools / items / enum
      Previous value: -[
      -  "find_legal_fournier_tool",
      -  "run_legal_fournier_tool",
      -  "get_visa_options",
      -  "check_beckham_eligibility",
      -  "get_residency_path",
      -  "explain_nie_process",
      -  "compare_tax_regimes",
      -  "route_to_legal_fournier_help",
      -  "create_legal_fournier_contact_request"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "find_legal_fournier_tool",
      +  "run_legal_fournier_tool",
      +  "get_paid_consultation_options",
      +  "get_paid_call_availability",
      +  "get_visa_options",
      +  "check_beckham_eligibility",
      +  "get_residency_path",
      +  "explain_nie_process",
      +  "compare_tax_regimes",
      +  "route_to_legal_fournier_help",
      +  "create_legal_fournier_contact_request"
      +]
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / suggested_follow_up_tools / items / enum
      Previous value: -[
      -  "find_legal_fournier_tool",
      -  "run_legal_fournier_tool",
      -  "get_visa_options",
      -  "check_beckham_eligibility",
      -  "get_residency_path",
      -  "explain_nie_process",
      -  "compare_tax_regimes",
      -  "route_to_legal_fournier_help"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "find_legal_fournier_tool",
      +  "run_legal_fournier_tool",
      +  "get_visa_options",
      +  "check_beckham_eligibility",
      +  "get_residency_path",
      +  "explain_nie_process",
      +  "compare_tax_regimes",
      +  "route_to_legal_fournier_help",
      +  "create_legal_fournier_contact_request"
      +]
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / suggested_follow_up_tools / items / enum
      Previous value: -[
      -  "get_visa_options",
      -  "check_beckham_eligibility",
      -  "get_residency_path",
      -  "explain_nie_process",
      -  "compare_tax_regimes",
      -  "route_to_legal_fournier_help"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "find_legal_fournier_tool",
      +  "run_legal_fournier_tool",
      +  "get_visa_options",
      +  "check_beckham_eligibility",
      +  "get_residency_path",
      +  "explain_nie_process",
      +  "compare_tax_regimes",
      +  "route_to_legal_fournier_help"
      +]
  4. First observed

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, covering the safety profile. The description adds context about the output being 'stable' and 'canonical,' which communicates reliability and authoritative sourcing beyond what annotations provide. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-structured sentence that front-loads the purpose and adds meaningful detail (stable workflow, procedural distinctions, canonical resource). No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a parameterless tool with an output schema, the description fully covers what is being returned and why it's useful ('for agents'). The output schema handles return-value specifics, so the description doesn't need to enumerate them. The tool is simple enough that this is complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. The description doesn't need to explain parameter meaning, and it doesn't; it focuses on the output content instead. Schema coverage is 100% (no parameters), so no gaps exist.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool returns 'the stable NIE and TIE workflow, the key procedural distinctions, and the canonical process resource for agents.' This uses a specific verb ('Return') and distinct resource (NIE/TIE workflow), which differentiates it from sibling tools like get_visa_options or check_beckham_eligibility.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use this tool: when an agent needs the canonical NIE/TIE workflow or procedural distinctions. It doesn't explicitly name alternatives or exclusions, but the context is clear enough for an agent to select this over related immigration/legal tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources