Skip to main content
Glama

Kundlit Vedic Astrology

Mobile number numerology

get_mobile_numerology
Read-onlyIdempotent

Returns a numerological reading of a mobile or landline number: the extracted digit string, the digit total, the single 1-9 number it reduces to, the overall vibe that reduced number carries, and the traditional meaning of each distinct digit present. Use this for 'is my phone number lucky' style questions, or when choosing between candidate numbers. It reads a number string only -- nothing about the person -- so for anything tied to a birth date use get_numerology. Read-only deterministic arithmetic over a fixed number table -- no ephemeris, no network lookup of the number, no writes, no auth, at least 30 requests/min/IP per server instance.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
mobile_numberYesPhone number in any format -- "+91 98765-43210", "9876543210" and "(020) 7946 0958" all work, since +, spaces, hyphens and brackets are stripped. Must contain at least one non-zero digit.

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Adds details beyond annotations: 'Read-only deterministic arithmetic over a fixed number table -- no ephemeris, no network lookup, no writes, no auth, at least 30 req/min/IP'. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two well-structured sentences. First sentence packs key purpose and output, second covers usage and behavior. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only tool with one well-documented parameter, the description covers purpose, usage, behavioral traits (including rate limits), and output fields, making it fully complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage 100% with detailed schema description for the single parameter. Description doesn't add significant meaning beyond what's in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states verb ('returns') and resource ('numerological reading of a mobile or landline number'), lists output components, and distinguishes from sibling tool get_numerology by clarifying it works on number strings only.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says when to use ('is my phone number lucky' questions, choosing between candidates) and when not to use ('for anything tied to a birth date use get_numerology'), naming the alternative tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct astrological calculation or domain: dosha checks, birth charts, compatibility, muhurta, panchang, numerology, transits, and Jaimini layer. Even similar tools (e.g., get_panchang vs get_muhurta_timings) are explicitly differentiated in their descriptions, and cross-references tell the agent which to use for which question.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: 'get_' for data retrieval and 'check_' for yes/no dosha assessments. No camelCase or mixed conventions. The naming is predictable and readable.

Tool Count4/5

At 17 tools, the set is slightly above the ideal 15-tool ceiling, but it is well-scoped for the breadth of Vedic astrology: each tool earns its place covering a distinct sub-domain. The count feels justified rather than bloated.

Completeness5/5

The surface covers the full lifecycle of a birth chart (details, full kundli, dasha), doshas (manglik, kaal sarp, sade sati), compatibility (kundli match), event planning (muhurta, panchang, year events, eclipses), numerology (personal, mobile, name), and advanced layers (upapada, transits). No obvious gaps or dead ends.