Skip to main content
Glama

list_articles

List every Kettle Logic insight article (title, slug, description) as JSON.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. It states the output format (JSON) and fields, but does not mention pagination, rate limits, or read-only nature. The output schema likely supplements this, but the description alone is minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, front-loaded sentence that conveys all necessary information with no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter listing tool, the description covers the core purpose and output format. The presence of an output schema further enhances completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters exist, so schema coverage is 100%. The description adds value by specifying the exact fields returned (title, slug, description), which goes beyond just stating 'JSON'.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists every Kettle Logic insight article and specifies the returned fields (title, slug, description). It distinguishes from siblings like get_article (single article) and search_articles (filtered results).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use for a complete list of all articles. While it does not explicitly exclude usage for filtered or single article needs, the context of sibling tools provides clear alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a distinct purpose: fetching a single article, fetching an industry overview, listing articles, listing industries, and searching articles. There is no overlap or ambiguity.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., get_article, list_industries), making them predictable and easy to understand.

Tool Count5/5

With exactly 5 tools, the set is well-scoped for the server's purpose of retrieving and searching article and industry content. No tool feels extraneous or missing.

Completeness5/5

The tool set covers all likely operations for a read-only content API: listing and getting both articles and industries, plus search. There are no obvious gaps for the stated domain.