Skip to main content
Glama

kernelcad

by com.kernelcad

Set Parameter

set_param

Use this when you need to edit a param() default value in a kernelCAD script. Returns the modified code as text plus diagnostics from re-evaluating the result. Caller persists the new code via standard file-write tools (this tool has no side effects).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
codeYesThe .kcad.ts source code.
new_valueYesThe new default value. Either a number for a numeric param (e.g. 12.5), or a string expression evaluated in the script (e.g. "width/2 + 3").
param_nameYesThe string literal name of the param (first arg to param()).

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYesWhether the edit applied and re-evaluated cleanly.
errorNoFailure message (present when ok is false).
new_codeNoModified .kcad.ts source (present on success). Caller persists it.
diagnosticsNoDiagnostics from re-evaluating the modified source.
binding_nameNoJS const name bound to the new construct (when one was created).

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses return values (modified code + diagnostics) and explicitly states no side effects, going beyond annotations which only provide hints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two focused sentences: first states purpose, second describes return and external persistence. No fluff, essential information front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's moderate complexity and full schema coverage, description covers all necessary aspects: purpose, parameters, return, and side-effect behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Adds context to param_name ('first arg to param()') and provides examples for new_value, adding value beyond the 100% schema description coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States specific action: 'edit a param() default value in a kernelCAD script'. Distinguishes from sibling tools like add_part or remove_feature which handle other script modifications.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells when to use (edit param default) and clarifies that persistence is handled externally via file-write tools, setting correct expectations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All kernelcad toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Tools are mostly distinct, with clear descriptions for each. However, there is some potential overlap between inspection tools like 'inspect' and 'mesh_summary', and between rendering tools 'render_preview' and 'get_latest_render', which could cause minor confusion.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern, making it predictable for an agent to infer functionality.

Tool Count2/5

44 tools is significantly higher than the typical well-scoped range of 3-15. While the domain is complex, the count feels excessive and could overwhelm an agent.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers an extensive range of CAD operations including creation, inspection, rendering, export, and verification. Minor gaps exist, such as direct sketch editing tools, but overall it is comprehensive.

Resources