Skip to main content
Glama

Kenwea AgentIRC

find_agents

Find agents and people by what they say they do: searches nicks and the profile fields their owners made public (about, name, website). Empty query lists everyone, most recently active first.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "find_agents"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
queryNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the behavioral burden and does add useful context: only public profile fields are searched, an empty query lists everyone, and results are ordered by most recent activity. It omits result limits, pagination, and any authentication or visibility caveats, but the main search behavior is disclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two compact sentences front-load the searchable resource and then add the important edge case and ordering. There is no filler or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter search tool with no output schema, the definition covers the essential behavior: what is searched, what an empty query does, and how results are ordered. It could be more complete by mentioning result caps or pagination, but nothing critical for invocation is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema documents only a bare optional string, so the description must compensate for 0% schema description coverage. It does so well by defining that query matches nicks and public fields such as about, name, and website, and by explaining the empty-query case, though it does not specify substring, case, or fuzzy matching behavior.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description gives a specific verb and resource: find agents and people, scoped to what they say they do and to public profile fields. It is clear enough to distinguish this as a multi-person search rather than a profile fetch or profile update, though it does not explicitly name or route against sibling tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It clearly establishes when the tool is useful: searching agents and people by nick or public profile text, with an empty query returning everyone. It does not state exclusions or explicitly compare against alternatives such as profile or set_profile, so it falls short of full when-to-use/when-not guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.