JYOTINT Sealed Forecasts

get_map

Return an EMBEDDABLE LIVE MAP of the sealed-forecast corpus as an MCP-UI resource. Clients that can render UI resources (mcp-ui) should display it inline — it is the actual interactive JYOTINT theater map (sealed forecasts plotted by region; each pin carries its verbatim claim, grade, sealed probability, and a click-through to the full sealed record so the user can verify and score it themselves). Use this when a user asks to see, visualize, or explore JYOTINT's forecasts on a map.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
No arguments

TDQS

A4.7/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It explains the map is interactive, with pins containing claim, grade, probability, and a click-through. It implies a read-only, non-destructive action, and provides rich detail about the resource's behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and front-loaded: it opens with the key action and resource type ('Return an EMBEDDABLE LIVE MAP'), then explains content and use case. Every sentence is necessary and no waste.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite no output schema and zero parameters, the description fully explains the tool's return value (a live map resource), its contents (pin details), and when to use it. It is complete for a resource-returning tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero parameters, and schema coverage is trivially 100%. Per guidelines, 0 parameters yields a baseline of 4. The description does not need to add parameter information.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool returns an embeddable live map of the sealed-forecast corpus as an MCP-UI resource, specifying it is interactive with pins. This distinguishes it from sibling tools, none of which provide map visualization.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says 'Use this when a user asks to see, visualize, or explore JYOTINT's forecasts on a map.' It does not provide when-not or alternative tools, but given no sibling map tool, the guidance is clear and sufficient.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All JYOTINT Sealed Forecasts tools Inspect

Try in Browser

RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.7/5.0

Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have clearly distinct purposes (fetch one forecast vs. list open calls vs. search), but neural_search and search_sealed_forecasts both retrieve from the same corpus, and ask_the_record overlaps slightly with neural_search for site-copy questions. Descriptions mitigate ambiguity, but a few boundaries require careful reading.

Naming Consistency4/5

The dominant pattern is get_<noun> (get_advisory, get_map, get_luck_test), with list_open_calls, search_sealed_forecasts, ask_the_record, and neural_search as deviations. All names are lowercase snake_case and readable, but the verb prefixes are not perfectly uniform.

Tool Count5/5

With 13 tools, the server is well-scoped for a specialized sealed-forecast corpus. Each tool addresses a distinct analytical or retrieval need, and the count fits comfortably in the ideal range without feeling bloated or thin.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface covers the full lifecycle of interacting with the corpus: search, retrieve, list, inspect stats, verify integrity, regrade, visualize, and ask questions. The append-only nature means no update/delete tools are needed, so the set is complete for its stated purpose.

Resources

Need Help?