Subreddit Wiki Index
get_subreddit_wiki_indexSubreddit Wiki Index Group: Subreddit Wiki. Billing per call: 1 Credits.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| subreddit | No |
get_subreddit_wiki_indexSubreddit Wiki Index Group: Subreddit Wiki. Billing per call: 1 Credits.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| subreddit | No |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It does not mention what the tool returns, any side effects, or even a basic indication that it is a read operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely short, but this is under-specification rather than conciseness. It lacks a clear sentence structure and fails to convey essential information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with a single parameter and no output schema, the description should clarify what the index represents and how it differs from similar tools. It provides none of that, making it inadequate for an agent to select or invoke it correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema shows a single 'subreddit' parameter with an example, but the description adds nothing beyond the schema. With 0% schema description coverage, the description should explain the parameter's purpose and format, which it does not.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description is a mere label ('Subreddit Wiki Index') with no verb or explanation of function. It restates the tool name and fails to distinguish from siblings like get_subreddit_wiki_page or get_subreddit_wiki_pages.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The terse billing note provides no contextual information about appropriate use cases.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.