Skip to main content
Glama

Search JobMojito documentation

search_documentation
Read-onlyIdempotent

Search ALL JobMojito documentation. This is the single entry point.

One call searches both documentation sources in parallel and returns a merged, source-labeled list — you do not need to choose a source or call a separate tool: • "developer" — developer.jobmojito.com: API reference, request/response schemas, tables, webhooks, code examples, integration guides. • "help" — help.jobmojito.com: recruiter, candidate, and administrator product guides (how the platform behaves for end users).

Use this whenever you need to understand how a feature, endpoint, field, or workflow works — including before calling an action tool you're unsure about. Then call get_documentation(url) with a returned URL to read the full page.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMax results per source (1-25).
queryYesNatural-language search query or keywords.
sourceNo"all" (default), "developer", or "help" to restrict the search.all

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already provide readOnlyHint=true and idempotentHint=true. The description goes beyond by detailing the parallel search across two sources, merging with source labels, and serving as the single entry point. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with clear structure: purpose, behavior, usage guidance, and a note about subsequent use of `get_documentation`. Bullet points effectively list the two documentation sources. Every sentence contributes meaning without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (search with merging) and the presence of an output schema (confirmed by context), the description fully explains the return format (merged, source-labeled list) and the role of the tool alongside `get_documentation`. It is complete for effective use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents the parameters. The description adds value by explaining the content of the 'developer' source (API reference, schemas, etc.) and 'help' source (product guides), enriching understanding of the `source` parameter beyond its enum values.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool searches all JobMojito documentation, merging results from two sources (developer and help) with labels. It distinguishes itself from the sibling tool `get_documentation` by positioning itself as the entry point and advising subsequent use of `get_documentation` for full pages.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells when to use the tool: 'Use this whenever you need to understand how a feature, endpoint, field, or workflow works — including before calling an action tool you're unsure about.' It also clarifies that the user does not need to choose a source or call a separate tool because it handles both sources in parallel.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Most tools target distinct resources and actions, with clear category prefixes like [Interviews], [Results], and [Admin]. A few pairs could be confused—create_interview vs. create_interview_from_questions and update_interview vs. set_interview_state—but the descriptions do enough to separate them.

Naming Consistency4/5

The overwhelming majority follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: create_*, get_*, list_*, update_*, generate_*. The main deviation is jobmojito_configuration, which is a noun phrase rather than an action verb, and a few longer names like request_another_interview_attempt break the clean pattern slightly.

Tool Count2/5

With 29 tools, this server is above the 25+ threshold and places a significant navigation burden on an agent. The tools are organized into coherent domains, but several admin/merchant and results tools could likely be consolidated.

Completeness3/5

The core interview lifecycle is well covered: create, read, update, list, state changes, result retrieval, and report generation. However, there are notable gaps such as no delete operations for interviews or catalogue directories, no candidate management beyond listing/registration, and no explicit result-decision tool.