Skip to main content
Glama

List merchants you can act as

list_my_merchants
Read-onlyIdempotent

FALLBACK merchant list for clients WITHOUT UI support.

Do NOT use this to choose or switch merchants when a UI is available — call jobmojito_configuration instead (it renders an interactive picker), and do not hand-format a merchant list as text. Use this tool only when the client cannot render MCP App UI. Returns the user's own account plus any sub-merchants; after a pick, pass merchant_id=<chosen id> on subsequent calls (OMIT for the own account).

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
searchNoOptional case-insensitive filter on sub-merchant name.
conversation_idNoThe conversation_id this server returned earlier in this conversation, unchanged, including after later user messages. Omit it if you have none. Recorded for the server developer's analytics.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
_mcp_instructionsNoServer-issued metadata for this conversation.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / conversation_id / description
      Previous value: -"Pass the exact conversation_id from the server's previous response, unchanged. The server provides it on the first call — never invent one, and do not issue parallel tool calls until you have it. Keep passing the same conversation_id for the rest of the conversation, including after later user messages or on a different task; do not reset it when the user starts a new request."New value: +"The conversation_id this server returned earlier in this conversation, unchanged, including after later user messages. Omit it if you have none. Recorded for the server developer's analytics."
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / conversation_id / description
      Previous value: -"Echo the conversation_id from the server's previous response. The server provides it on the first call — never invent one, and do not issue parallel tool calls until you have it."New value: +"Pass the exact conversation_id from the server's previous response, unchanged. The server provides it on the first call — never invent one, and do not issue parallel tool calls until you have it. Keep passing the same conversation_id for the rest of the conversation, including after later user messages or on a different task; do not reset it when the user starts a new request."
  3. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / conversation_id
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Echo the conversation_id from the server's previous response. The server provides it on the first call — never invent one, and do not issue parallel tool calls until you have it.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties
      Added value: +{
      +  "_mcp_instructions": {
      +    "description": "Server-issued metadata for this conversation.",
      +    "properties": {
      +      "conversation_id": {
      +        "description": "The server-issued conversation identifier.",
      +        "type": "string"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "type": "object"
      +  }
      +}
  4. First observed

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint=false and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds genuine post-call behavior: what the list contains and how the chosen id is carried forward ('pass merchant_id=<chosen id> on subsequent calls, OMIT for the own account'). It does not mention pagination or ordering, which keeps it from a 5.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The fallback role and the exclusion are front-loaded in the first two lines, before the result shape. It is tight overall, though the 'do not hand-format a merchant list as text' clause slightly overlaps the 'do not use when UI is available' directive.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Return values need not be described because an output schema exists, and the description covers the remaining gaps an agent needs: when the tool is valid, what it returns conceptually, and how to act on the result. Complete for a zero-required-param read tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3, but the description adds cross-tool meaning the schema cannot express: how the result feeds later calls via merchant_id and the special OMIT convention for the own account. It does not restate the search filter semantics, which stay in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource ('FALLBACK merchant list') and its exact population ('the user's own account plus any sub-merchants'). It also names the distinguishing sibling, jobmojito_configuration, so an agent can tell the two apart without opening either schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit when-not-to-use ('Do NOT use this to choose or switch merchants when a UI is available'), a named alternative, a prohibition on hand-formatting the list as text, and the precise condition for use ('only when the client cannot render MCP App UI'). Nothing is left to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.