Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description explicitly states that the tool does not send any messages and only organizes data, which is a key behavioral trait given the lack of annotations. This provides transparency about side effects (or lack thereof), though it does not detail all possible behaviors like error handling.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, with two sentences that clearly state the purpose and a key behavioral note. It is well-structured and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description provides the core purpose and a key limitation, but it does not mention what the output brief looks like or any conditions for use. Given the number of parameters and lack of output schema, it could be more detailed, but it is adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already includes descriptions for all parameters, and the tool description does not add additional meaning about how parameters are used or combined. Since schema coverage is 100%, the baseline is 3, and no extra information is provided.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool creates a structured project brief from conversation data, which is a specific action on a specific resource. It also clarifies what it does not do (send messages), which further distinguishes its purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus sibling tools like estimateWebsite or submitInquiry. It only implies usage for organizing data into a brief, but lacks explicit conditions or alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.