Skip to main content
Glama

Square Free Part

square_free_part
Read-onlyIdempotent

n divided by its largest square factor. 12 gives 3, 18 gives 2, 36 gives 1, and 45 gives 5. n runs from 1 to 1000000000000. Price: $0.001 USDC per successful call (x402, Solana). Same tool over HTTPS: POST https://scorptech.it.com/api/x402/v1/square-free-part

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "n": "<n>"
    },
    "name": "square_free_part"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already establish read-only, idempotent, non-destructive behavior. The description adds useful context beyond that: pricing per successful x402 call and an equivalent HTTPS endpoint. It does not detail error behavior, but the added cost and endpoint context is meaningful.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The definition is front-loaded and illustrated with compact examples. Pricing and endpoint details are relevant for invocation, though slightly interrupt the mathematical explanation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple unary math function, the description supplies definition, examples, input domain, cost, and access endpoint. No output schema exists, but the examples show return behavior. Minor error/edge-case guidance is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It explains n via the operation and examples and repeats the 1-to-1e12 domain, but it does not add much beyond the schema's integer type and bounds.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description gives a precise mathematical definition and worked examples, so an agent can understand exactly what is computed. It does not differentiate this tool from similarly named siblings such as squarefree_part or square_part, so it falls short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It provides examples and an input range but never states when to use this tool versus alternatives. With many closely related number-theory siblings, the lack of explicit routing guidance is a clear gap.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources