Skip to main content
Glama

Baum Sweet

baum_sweet
Read-onlyIdempotent

The Baum-Sweet bit of n. It is 1 when every run of 0s in the binary expansion has even length, and 0 when some run of 0s has odd length. b(0) is 1 and b(2) is 0. n runs from 0 to 1000000. Price: $0.001 USDC per successful call (x402, Solana). Same tool over HTTPS: POST https://scorptech.it.com/api/x402/v1/baum-sweet

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "n": "<n>"
    },
    "name": "baum_sweet"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already establish that this is a read-only, idempotent, non-destructive open-world operation. The description adds important behavioral context beyond annotations by disclosing the $0.001 USDC x402 charge per successful call and the alternate HTTPS endpoint.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the key definition and examples, then gives range, pricing, and transport details. All four sentences carry useful information and none are redundant.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema present, the description still explains the return values as 0 or 1 and includes edge examples. Together with annotations, range, pricing, and endpoint information, it is complete enough for an agent to call the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The sole parameter has 0% schema description coverage, but the description compensates by explaining that n is the Baum-Sweet index, stating its valid range, and giving b(0)=1 and b(2)=0 as examples. The integer type and exact bounds are already in the schema, so this is adequate without being exhaustive.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific mathematical object, the Baum-Sweet bit of n, and gives an exact condition for when the result is 1 or 0. It is distinguishable from sibling sequence tools because the defining property is stated explicitly, not just implied by the name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the precise definition and the stated range for n, so an agent can infer when the tool applies. However, there is no explicit guidance comparing it with related sibling tools or stating when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources