Skip to main content
Glama

ScorpTech x402 Tools

Wedderburn Split

wedderburn_split
Read-onlyIdempotent

The Wedderburn-Etherington split of n. cross is the sum of a(i)a(n-i) over the pairs below the middle, and middle is a(k)(a(k)+1)/2 when n = 2k and 0 when n is odd. n = 6 gives cross 5, middle 1, and value 6. n runs from 1 to 80. Price: $0.001 USDC per successful call (x402, Solana). Same tool over HTTPS: POST https://scorptech.it.com/api/x402/v1/wedderburn-split

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "n": "<n>"
    },
    "name": "wedderburn_split"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already establish read-only, idempotent, non-destructive, open-world behavior. The description adds material context beyond annotations: the $0.001 USDC x402 cost, Solana payment rail, HTTPS endpoint, and n range. It does not detail payment/error mechanics, but this is substantial added behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loads the mathematical definition, then example, range, and access details. Dense but earns most sentences; could be slightly clearer, but no obvious filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema exists, so the description must convey return values; the n=6 example implies cross, middle, and value fields. Combined with formula, range, and payment details, it is mostly complete for a one-parameter computational tool, though it omits explicit return-shape and error behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only one parameter n with 0% schema description coverage, so the description must compensate. It gives the range 1-80 and a worked example n=6, but the range merely repeats schema min/max and it does not clarify n beyond 'split of n'; some ambiguity remains.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Defines the specific mathematical resource: the Wedderburn-Etherington split of n, including cross, middle, and value, with an n=6 example. However, it does not distinguish this from sibling tools such as wedderburn, wedderburn_sum, or wedderburn_mod, so it stops short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives only the input range and a worked example; it does not say when to choose this split tool over wedderburn, wedderburn_sum, or wedderburn_mod. No explicit when/when-not guidance is present.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources