Skip to main content
Glama

ScorpTech x402 Tools

Thabit

thabit
Read-onlyIdempotent

The nth Thabit number, 3*2^n - 1. n=0 gives 2, n=1 gives 5, and n=2 gives 11. n runs from 0 to 256. Past 15 digits the value is a decimal string. Price: $0.001 USDC per successful call (x402, Solana). Same tool over HTTPS: POST https://scorptech.it.com/api/x402/v1/thabit

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "n": "<n>"
    },
    "name": "thabit"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare read-only, idempotent, non-destructive behavior, and the description adds meaningful extra context: the numeric range cap and the key output trait that past 15 digits the result becomes a decimal string. Pricing and the alternate HTTPS endpoint are further useful operational details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the formula and examples, followed by range, output format, price, and endpoint. Every element is useful, though the price/endpoint tail is slightly redundant traffic for a pure tool-selection decision.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description fills the gap by explaining the decimal-string return format past 15 digits, and the range plus worked examples fully prepare an agent to call it. Little is missing for a single-param deterministic tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so the description must carry the param, and it does: n's range (0-256), its role in the formula, and example mappings n=0→2, n=1→5, n=2→11. This compensates well, though it doesn't discuss bound behavior at n=256.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the exact formula (3*2^n - 1), the resource (Thabit number), and worked examples for n=0,1,2, making it unmistakable among the many number-theory siblings. An agent can identify the tool without opening the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It defines the valid domain (n runs from 0 to 256) and illustrates expected values, which is clear context for correct use. It stops short of naming when-not or alternative tools, but no obvious sibling overlap exists to route against.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources