Skip to main content
Glama

ScorpTech x402 Tools

Exp Next

exp_next
Read-onlyIdempotent

The smallest exponential perfect number that is at least n. 1 gives 36, 37 gives 180, 180 stays 180, and 181 gives 252. n runs from 1 to 5000. Price: $0.001 USDC per successful call (x402, Solana). Same tool over HTTPS: POST https://scorptech.it.com/api/x402/v1/exp-next

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "n": "<n>"
    },
    "name": "exp_next"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already establish read-only, idempotent, open-world, and non-destructive behavior. The description adds meaningful operational context: pricing, x402/Solana payment, successful-call charging, and an HTTPS endpoint alternative.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The purpose is front-loaded, the examples are compact and useful, and the range, pricing, and endpoint details are included without filler. Every sentence contributes to correct use or cost awareness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter math tool with no output schema, the description is nearly complete: it provides range, examples, pricing, and endpoint. It could be slightly stronger by explicitly stating the return type or defining 'exponential perfect number' formally.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must carry the parameter semantics. It successfully explains that n is bounded from 1 to 5000 and gives concrete input/output examples, including an inclusive 'n stays n' case.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a precise operation: compute the smallest exponential perfect number that is at least n. The examples clarify the behavior for boundary-like values, and the 'next/at least n' framing distinguishes it from sibling tools such as exp_perfect.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the purpose and examples, but there is no explicit guidance on when to use this tool instead of exp_perfect, exp_count, exp_divisors, or exp_sigma. It is adequate but lacks direct sibling routing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources