Skip to main content
Glama

Imperio — Italian Tax & Compliance Tools

Cerca ATECO per attività

search_ateco
Read-onlyIdempotent

Ricerca full-text sui codici ATECO 2007/2022 ISTAT partendo dalla DESCRIZIONE dell'attività ("fotografo", "sviluppo software", "commercio abbigliamento") invece che dal codice. Case/accent-insensitive, con stemming e alias colloquiali per-mestiere; accetta anche un prefisso di codice. Usa questo quando il codice NON è noto — lookup_ateco serve al caso opposto (codice noto → descrizione). Risultati ordinati per pertinenza. Gratis (€0), deterministico, nessun login richiesto.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
qYesAttività da cercare, in italiano (es. 'fotografo', 'idraulico', 'consulenza informatica').
limitNoNumero massimo di risultati (default 20).
sectionNoFiltra per sezione ATECO (lettera A–U, es. J = servizi di informazione e comunicazione, M = attività professionali). Opzionale.

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations provide readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, etc. Description adds critical context: stemmed search, alias support, deterministic, free, no login required. No contradiction found.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two dense sentences with no fluff. Front-loaded with purpose and key features. Every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a 3-parameter search tool with no output schema, the description covers behavior, constraints (auth, cost), ordering, and alternatives. Nothing missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline 3. Description adds that the search is 'case/accent-insensitive, con stemming e alias per-mestiere', which enhances meaning for the 'q' parameter beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description explicitly states 'Ricerca full-text sui codici ATECO' using the description, and contrasts with sibling 'lookup_ateco'. Verb 'cerca' and resource 'codici ATECO' are clear, distinguishing from other tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Clearly says when to use: 'quando il codice NON è noto' and points to 'lookup_ateco' for the opposite. Also details case-insensitivity, stemming, and alias handling.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Tools are mostly distinct, targeting specific tax/compliance operations. The pair 'parse_fatturapa' and 'parse_verify_fatturapa' are similar but differentiated by the verification step. The detailed descriptions further reduce ambiguity.

Naming Consistency4/5

Names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with prefixes like 'calc_', 'validate_', 'lookup_', 'parse_', 'nis2_', etc. Minor deviations exist (e.g., 'compose_f24' vs 'calc_forfettario', 'intrastat_compose' vs 'intrastat_periodicity') but overall the pattern is clear.

Tool Count3/5

With 23 tools, the set is on the heavier side for a single server, covering many subdomains of Italian tax and compliance. While each tool seems purposeful, the count exceeds the typical well-scoped range (3-15), making it slightly overwhelming.

Completeness4/5

The tool surface covers a wide array of Italian tax and compliance needs: tax calculations, F24 composition, INTRASTAT, ATECO, NIS2, FatturaPA, and validations. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no IRPEF or IRAP calculators), but the core tax workflows are well supported.

Resources