Skip to main content
Glama

ikeytz - Schlüsseldienst Ludwigsburg

List Service Areas

list_service_areas
Read-only

WHAT: All 52 service-area places (orte SSOT). Each item: slug, name, plz, lat, lng, google_maps, icbm, kind, parent, url (www keyword page), embed_map (https://maps.ikeytz.com/{slug}), geo_api, maps_mcp. related includes maps llms.txt. count=52. USE to pick a slug before get_service_area. DOES NOT verify GPS live. www sitemap contains 0× maps.ikeytz.com. iframe on HTML is DE Ortsseiten only. NEXT: get_service_area({slug}) or maps MCP geo lookup by coordinates (not this server).

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
localeNoHTML locale for canonicalUrl and path prefixes. de = default, URLs have no prefix (https://www.ikeytz.com/preise). en|fr|ru|fa|ar|tr = prefix /{locale}/ (https://www.ikeytz.com/en/preise). Omit or empty = de. Does not change prices, phone numbers, or legal German names. Not a maps.ikeytz.com locale (maps is German-only).de

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYestrue = use summary, canonicalUrl, and extra keys. false = do not invent data; read error + hint and retry with valid args or open hint.
hintNoPresent when ok=false. Absolute URL the agent should open or pass to get_ai_page / get_discovery.
toolYesEcho of the tool name that produced this object (e.g. get_service_area).
countNoAlways 52 when ok.
errorNoPresent when ok=false. Codes include: unknown_tool, unknown_place, unknown_auswahl, unknown_ratgeber, unknown_doc, unknown_discovery, faq_not_found, wissen_not_found, serp_not_found, q_required, bad_datetime, bad_when_key, plus HTTP errors from fetch.
itemsNoOne object per place; fields = PLACE geo + maps URLs.
localeNoLocale actually used for URLs (args.locale or de).
relatedNoAlways includes https://www.ikeytz.com/llms.txt. Geo tools also include https://maps.ikeytz.com/llms.txt.
summaryNoPrimary text for the model. For discovery tools this is the file window (possibly thousands of characters). For list tools a compact one-liner. Quote with attribution.
attributionYesRequired citation: 'Quelle: Schlüsseldienst Ludwigsburg ikeytz (ikeytz.com) · ai-train=no · https://www.ikeytz.com/.well-known/ai.txt'
canonicalUrlNoBest URL to show the user: https://www.ikeytz.com… page, or tel:+49…, mailto:…, https://wa.me/…. Prefer this over constructing URLs.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

readOnlyHint already covers safety, and the description adds genuinely useful behavioral context: the exact count (52), the returned fields, and the limit "DOES NOT verify GPS live." Some remarks ("www sitemap contains 0× maps.ikeytz.com", "iframe on HTML is DE Ortsseiten only") add boundary detail but are opaque without shared context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The WHAT/USE/NEXT labeling front-loads the essentials effectively, but the definition is packed telegraphically with jargon and mid-body sentences that don't obviously serve selection or invocation (the www sitemap and iframe notes). Several phrases don't earn their place for an agent picking a slug.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists and the description still helpfully sketches the item shape and count, and the only parameter is schema-documented, so an agent has what it needs to call and chain this tool. The opaque boundary sentences keep it short of a 5.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the single locale parameter is fully documented in the schema itself (default, prefix behavior, scope limits). The description says nothing about locale, so per the high-coverage baseline a 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific verb+resource (lists all 52 service-area orte) and enumerates the exact fields each item returns (slug, name, plz, lat, lng, etc.). It clearly separates this from the sibling get_service_area, which is the single-item counterpart.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

"USE to pick a slug before get_service_area" gives an explicit use case and workflow, and "NEXT: get_service_area({slug}) or maps MCP geo lookup by coordinates (not this server)" routes the agent to the right follow-up. The guidance is present but cluttered by cryptic boundary notes, and it never states when to avoid this tool beyond the maps-server exclusion.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources