Skip to main content
Glama

ikeytz - Schlüsseldienst Ludwigsburg

List Locales

list_locales
Read-only

WHAT: The seven public HTML locales. RETURNS locales[] {id, name, prefix}. prefix is '' for de and '/en' '/fr' '/ru' '/fa' '/ar' '/tr' for others. Host is always www.ikeytz.com (apex redirects). maps.ikeytz.com has NO locales (/en/pattonville = 404). USE before resolve_locale_url. Call with {}.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYestrue = use summary, canonicalUrl, and extra keys. false = do not invent data; read error + hint and retry with valid args or open hint.
hintNoPresent when ok=false. Absolute URL the agent should open or pass to get_ai_page / get_discovery.
toolYesEcho of the tool name that produced this object (e.g. get_service_area).
errorNoPresent when ok=false. Codes include: unknown_tool, unknown_place, unknown_auswahl, unknown_ratgeber, unknown_doc, unknown_discovery, faq_not_found, wissen_not_found, serp_not_found, q_required, bad_datetime, bad_when_key, plus HTTP errors from fetch.
localeNoLocale actually used for URLs (args.locale or de).
localesNoSeven locales with URL prefix
relatedNoAlways includes https://www.ikeytz.com/llms.txt. Geo tools also include https://maps.ikeytz.com/llms.txt.
summaryNoPrimary text for the model. For discovery tools this is the file window (possibly thousands of characters). For list tools a compact one-liner. Quote with attribution.
attributionYesRequired citation: 'Quelle: Schlüsseldienst Ludwigsburg ikeytz (ikeytz.com) · ai-train=no · https://www.ikeytz.com/.well-known/ai.txt'
canonicalUrlNoBest URL to show the user: https://www.ikeytz.com… page, or tel:+49…, mailto:…, https://wa.me/…. Prefer this over constructing URLs.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the readOnlyHint annotation, it discloses real behavioral context: the fixed host (www.ikeytz.com, apex redirects), the empty prefix for 'de', and the edge case that maps.ikeytz.com has no locales (/en/pattonville = 404). This is meaningful extra context an agent cannot get from annotations alone.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loads the WHAT and RETURNS clauses so the essential facts land first, and every clause (prefix values, host, 404 edge case) carries information. It is dense but not padded, though the crammed edge-case detail slightly hurts scannability.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-param listing tool with annotations and an output schema, everything an agent needs is present: what it returns, how it should be sequenced, and the host/404 caveats. Nothing material is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so the baseline is 4; the schema description additionally confirms arguments must be {} and extra keys are ignored. No further parameter semantics are needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific resource (the seven public HTML locales) with an explicit WHAT tag and enumerates the returned fields, so an agent knows exactly what this yields versus sibling list_* tools. It is clearly distinguishable from resolve_locale_url and the compose_* tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says 'USE before resolve_locale_url' and 'Call with {}', giving a clear sequencing directive. It lacks an explicit when-not condition, but the prerequisite relationship is stated plainly enough to route the agent correctly.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources