Skip to main content
Glama

ikeytz - Schlüsseldienst Ludwigsburg

List Footer

list_footer
Read-only

WHAT: Curated internal footer paths including legal + /it + /mcp-hub + /angebot + /ankuendigungen. RETURNS items[] {path,url}. Not a pixel-perfect HTML scrape; external directory URLs live on get_links / MCP_PUBLIC_LINKS via get_mcp_hub. USE to discover legal slugs before get_legal. NEXT: get_legal(doc), get_it, get_mcp_hub.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
localeNoHTML locale for canonicalUrl and path prefixes. de = default, URLs have no prefix (https://www.ikeytz.com/preise). en|fr|ru|fa|ar|tr = prefix /{locale}/ (https://www.ikeytz.com/en/preise). Omit or empty = de. Does not change prices, phone numbers, or legal German names. Not a maps.ikeytz.com locale (maps is German-only).de

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYestrue = use summary, canonicalUrl, and extra keys. false = do not invent data; read error + hint and retry with valid args or open hint.
hintNoPresent when ok=false. Absolute URL the agent should open or pass to get_ai_page / get_discovery.
toolYesEcho of the tool name that produced this object (e.g. get_service_area).
errorNoPresent when ok=false. Codes include: unknown_tool, unknown_place, unknown_auswahl, unknown_ratgeber, unknown_doc, unknown_discovery, faq_not_found, wissen_not_found, serp_not_found, q_required, bad_datetime, bad_when_key, plus HTTP errors from fetch.
itemsNoInternal footer paths
localeNoLocale actually used for URLs (args.locale or de).
relatedNoAlways includes https://www.ikeytz.com/llms.txt. Geo tools also include https://maps.ikeytz.com/llms.txt.
summaryNoPrimary text for the model. For discovery tools this is the file window (possibly thousands of characters). For list tools a compact one-liner. Quote with attribution.
attributionYesRequired citation: 'Quelle: Schlüsseldienst Ludwigsburg ikeytz (ikeytz.com) · ai-train=no · https://www.ikeytz.com/.well-known/ai.txt'
canonicalUrlNoBest URL to show the user: https://www.ikeytz.com… page, or tel:+49…, mailto:…, https://wa.me/…. Prefer this over constructing URLs.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare readOnlyHint=true, so the safety profile is already covered. The description adds real context beyond that: the return shape (items[] {path,url}) and the caveat that it is a curated list rather than a full HTML scrape, which prevents wrong expectations about completeness.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

WHAT/RETURNS/USE/NEXT structure is front-loaded and wastes no sentences. The telegraphic, jargon-dense phrasing is efficient, though a few fragments ('external directory URLs live on get_links / MCP_PUBLIC_LINKS') pack a lot of unresolved references into one clause.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With one fully documented optional parameter and an output schema, the description needs only to state scope, return shape, and routing – all present. Nothing an agent needs to call it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and the locale enum description is unusually thorough (prefix rules, defaults, what it does not affect). The description says nothing about locale, so it adds no value beyond the schema; baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (list) and resource (footer paths), then enumerates the exact slugs covered (legal, /it, /mcp-hub, /angebot, /ankuendigungen). It also explicitly disclaims what it is not ('not a pixel-perfect HTML scrape') and names the sibling tools that hold external directory URLs, so an agent can separate it from get_links/get_mcp_hub without inspecting schemas.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives an explicit when-to-use ('USE to discover legal slugs before get_legal') and a concrete next-step chain ('NEXT: get_legal(doc), get_it, get_mcp_hub'). The routing to the companion tool is unambiguous.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources