Skip to main content
Glama

ikeytz – Schlüsseldienst Ludwigsburg

by com.ikeytz

Get Partner Info

get_partner_info
Read-only

WHAT: Partner-werden info. formSubmit=false — agents MUST NOT claim they sent the form. RETURNS partnerEmail for a mailto. NEXT: compose_mailto or tell the user to open /partner-werden themselves.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
localeNoHTML locale for canonicalUrl and path prefixes. de = default, URLs have no prefix (https://www.ikeytz.com/preise). en|fr|ru|fa|ar|tr = prefix /{locale}/ (https://www.ikeytz.com/en/preise). Omit or empty = de. Does not change prices, phone numbers, or legal German names. Not a maps.ikeytz.com locale (maps is German-only).de

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYestrue = use summary, canonicalUrl, and extra keys. false = do not invent data; read error + hint and retry with valid args or open hint.
hintNoPresent when ok=false. Absolute URL the agent should open or pass to get_ai_page / get_discovery.
toolYesEcho of the tool name that produced this object (e.g. get_service_area).
errorNoPresent when ok=false. Codes include: unknown_tool, unknown_place, unknown_auswahl, unknown_ratgeber, unknown_doc, unknown_discovery, faq_not_found, wissen_not_found, serp_not_found, q_required, bad_datetime, bad_when_key, plus HTTP errors from fetch.
localeNoLocale actually used for URLs (args.locale or de).
relatedNoAlways includes https://www.ikeytz.com/llms.txt. Geo tools also include https://maps.ikeytz.com/llms.txt.
summaryNoPrimary text for the model. For discovery tools this is the file window (possibly thousands of characters). For list tools a compact one-liner. Quote with attribution.
attributionYesRequired citation: 'Quelle: Schlüsseldienst Ludwigsburg ikeytz (ikeytz.com) · ai-train=no · https://www.ikeytz.com/.well-known/ai.txt'
canonicalUrlNoBest URL to show the user: https://www.ikeytz.com… page, or tel:+49…, mailto:…, https://wa.me/…. Prefer this over constructing URLs.

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds behavior beyond readOnlyHint=true by warning that formSubmit=false and instructing agents not to claim they submitted the form. It also clarifies the main output (partnerEmail) and the expected next action, which is valuable operational context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is highly concise and uses clear labels (WHAT, RETURNS, NEXT) to front-load the essential information. Every segment serves a distinct purpose and there is no redundant wording.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-optional-parameter read-only tool with an output schema, the description provides the key behavioral warning, return value, and recommended follow-up. It is slightly thin on when the tool should be chosen over siblings, but overall it gives an agent enough to call and use the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The only parameter, locale, has 100% schema description coverage with detailed explanation of defaults, URL prefixes, and non-locale behavior. The description adds no parameter-specific information, but with complete schema coverage the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the tool returns partner-werden info and specifically RETURNS partnerEmail for a mailto, so an agent can tell what the tool produces. It does not explicitly differentiate itself from sibling get_* tools, but the partner-werden context and next-step hint make the resource clear.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The intended use is implied by the name and 'Partner-werden info' rather than explicitly stated. There is no comparison to alternative tools or a clear 'use when the user asks about becoming a partner' condition, though the NEXT instruction gives useful follow-up context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All ikeytz – Schlüsseldienst Ludwigsburg toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation3/5

Many tools have clearly distinct roles, but there is real overlap: get_discovery duplicates get_llms_txt/get_llms_mcp_server/get_sitemap_txt, get_it and get_mcp_hub describe the same machines, and get_page_summary is a stub that competes with get_ai_page/get_serp_snippet. The detailed descriptions help, but an agent could still misselect among the discovery and pointer tools.

Naming Consistency4/5

The overwhelming majority follow a consistent snake_case verb-noun pattern: get_*, list_*, compose_*, resolve_*. Minor deviations like site_overview, get_it, and find_by_keyword are readable but break the dominant convention.

Tool Count2/5

45 tools for a single small-business website is excessive and well above the 25+ threshold. Many tools are pointer/list aliases or discovery-file accessors that could be consolidated without losing capability.

Completeness4/5

Core workflows are well covered: identity, contact, emergency info, pricing, invoicing, service areas, FAQs, legal pages, and generic page content via get_ai_page. Minor gaps exist around explicit opening-hours details, existing customer reviews, and maps-domain functionality, but these are mostly declared out of scope rather than dead ends.

Resources