Skip to main content
Glama

ikeytz - Schlüsseldienst Ludwigsburg

Get Page Summary

get_page_summary
Read-only

WHAT: Stub pointer only — NOT the page body. summary says to use ai-pages or HTML. RETURNS path (locale prefix stripped). USE get_ai_page or get_serp_snippet for real text. path optional (default /).

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pathNoOptional marketing path. Omit or empty = /. Examples: /preise, /en/preise, /kontakt. Locale prefix stripped in the return path.
localeNoHTML locale for canonicalUrl and path prefixes. de = default, URLs have no prefix (https://www.ikeytz.com/preise). en|fr|ru|fa|ar|tr = prefix /{locale}/ (https://www.ikeytz.com/en/preise). Omit or empty = de. Does not change prices, phone numbers, or legal German names. Not a maps.ikeytz.com locale (maps is German-only).de

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYestrue = use summary, canonicalUrl, and extra keys. false = do not invent data; read error + hint and retry with valid args or open hint.
hintNoPresent when ok=false. Absolute URL the agent should open or pass to get_ai_page / get_discovery.
pathNoPath without locale prefix
toolYesEcho of the tool name that produced this object (e.g. get_service_area).
errorNoPresent when ok=false. Codes include: unknown_tool, unknown_place, unknown_auswahl, unknown_ratgeber, unknown_doc, unknown_discovery, faq_not_found, wissen_not_found, serp_not_found, q_required, bad_datetime, bad_when_key, plus HTTP errors from fetch.
localeNoLocale actually used for URLs (args.locale or de).
relatedNoAlways includes https://www.ikeytz.com/llms.txt. Geo tools also include https://maps.ikeytz.com/llms.txt.
summaryNoPrimary text for the model. For discovery tools this is the file window (possibly thousands of characters). For list tools a compact one-liner. Quote with attribution.
attributionYesRequired citation: 'Quelle: Schlüsseldienst Ludwigsburg ikeytz (ikeytz.com) · ai-train=no · https://www.ikeytz.com/.well-known/ai.txt'
canonicalUrlNoBest URL to show the user: https://www.ikeytz.com… page, or tel:+49…, mailto:…, https://wa.me/…. Prefer this over constructing URLs.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / locale
      Added value: +{
      +  "default": "de",
      +  "description": "HTML locale for canonicalUrl and path prefixes. de = default, URLs have no prefix (https://www.ikeytz.com/preise). en|fr|ru|fa|ar|tr = prefix /{locale}/ (https://www.ikeytz.com/en/preise). Omit or empty = de. Does not change prices, phone numbers, or legal German names. Not a maps.ikeytz.com locale (maps is German-only).",
      +  "enum": [
      +    "de",
      +    "en",
      +    "fr",
      +    "ru",
      +    "fa",
      +    "ar",
      +    "tr"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / path
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Optional marketing path. Omit or empty = /. Examples: /preise, /en/preise, /kontakt. Locale prefix stripped in the return path.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  2. First observed

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only declare readOnlyHint=true, so the description carries real additional weight: it discloses that the payload is a stub pointer rather than page text and that the returned path has the locale prefix stripped. That is meaningful behavioral context an agent cannot get from the annotations alone.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is short and front-loads the key caveat, but the telegraphic fragments ('summary says to use ai-pages or HTML') are confusing — they reference an unexplained 'summary' field and an 'HTML' target rather than a tool name, adding ambiguity instead of clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present and only readOnlyHint annotations, the description supplies the critical missing context: this is a pointer, not content, and where to go for content. The main residual gap is that it never states the positive use case for calling this tool at all.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents path, its default, examples, and the locale enum semantics. The description only repeats 'path optional (default /)' and adds nothing beyond the schema, which is the expected baseline when schema coverage is complete.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description immediately defines the tool as a 'Stub pointer only' and explicitly negates the natural expectation set by the name (it is 'NOT the page body'), then states it returns a path with the locale prefix stripped. That is specific enough to distinguish it from get_ai_page and get_serp_snippet, though 'what a summary actually is' beyond a pointer stays slightly fuzzy.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly routes the agent elsewhere for real content ('USE get_ai_page or get_serp_snippet for real text'), which is strong negative guidance and names the correct alternatives. It stops short of stating the positive condition under which this tool is the right choice, so it is not a full 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources