ikeytz – Schlüsseldienst Ludwigsburg

Get It

get_it

Read-only

WHAT: HTML page /it — two MCP machines documented. RETURNS website={name:com.ikeytz/website,mcp,card,npm,cli,readme=npm CLI,httpReadme=www /mcp-readme.md}, maps={name:com.ikeytz/maps,… no httpReadme}, proxy=false, page=/it, itEmail, aiEmail. USE to tell an agent there are TWO endpoints (www vs maps). www /mcp never calls maps /mcp. HTML path /it is not Italian. Hub HTML is /mcp-hub (get_mcp_hub). CLI npm is a third channel, not this HTTP server.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`locale`	No	HTML locale for canonicalUrl and path prefixes. de = default, URLs have no prefix (https://www.ikeytz.com/preise). en\|fr\|ru\|fa\|ar\|tr = prefix /{locale}/ (https://www.ikeytz.com/en/preise). Omit or empty = de. Does not change prices, phone numbers, or legal German names. Not a maps.ikeytz.com locale (maps is German-only).	de

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`ok`	Yes	true = use summary, canonicalUrl, and extra keys. false = do not invent data; read error + hint and retry with valid args or open hint.
`hint`	No	Present when ok=false. Absolute URL the agent should open or pass to get_ai_page / get_discovery.
`maps`	No	maps machine com.ikeytz/maps
`page`	No	Locale /it URL.
`tool`	Yes	Echo of the tool name that produced this object (e.g. get_service_area).
`error`	No	Present when ok=false. Codes include: unknown_tool, unknown_place, unknown_auswahl, unknown_ratgeber, unknown_doc, unknown_discovery, faq_not_found, wissen_not_found, serp_not_found, q_required, bad_datetime, bad_when_key, plus HTTP errors from fetch.
`proxy`	No	www does not proxy maps.
`locale`	No	Locale actually used for URLs (args.locale or de).
`aiEmail`	No	Public AI/abuse mailbox.
`itEmail`	No	Public IT contact mailbox.
`related`	No	Always includes https://www.ikeytz.com/llms.txt. Geo tools also include https://maps.ikeytz.com/llms.txt.
`summary`	No	Primary text for the model. For discovery tools this is the file window (possibly thousands of characters). For list tools a compact one-liner. Quote with attribution.
`website`	No	www machine com.ikeytz/website
`attribution`	Yes	Required citation: 'Quelle: Schlüsseldienst Ludwigsburg ikeytz (ikeytz.com) · ai-train=no · https://www.ikeytz.com/.well-known/ai.txt'
`canonicalUrl`	No	Best URL to show the user: https://www.ikeytz.com… page, or tel:+49…, mailto:…, https://wa.me/…. Prefer this over constructing URLs.

TDQS

A4.6/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark the operation readOnlyHint=true, and the description adds meaningful behavioral context: www /mcp never calls maps /mcp, proxy=false, and /it is not Italian. These details go beyond the structured fields and help the agent avoid misconceptions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The WHAT/RETURNS/USE structure front-loads the core purpose and keeps the description dense. A few phrases are cryptic or use ellipses ('maps={...}'), and some details are niche, but overall every sentence carries distinct information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple single-optional-parameter schema and presence of an output schema, the description is complete enough. It covers the page's role, the two endpoints, the distinction from the hub tool, and the non-HTTP CLI channel, so an agent has sufficient context to invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The only parameter, locale, is fully documented in the input schema with an enum, default value, and detailed explanation of URL prefix behavior. Schema coverage is 100%, so the description does not need to add parameter semantics; the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific resource ('HTML page /it') and explains it documents two MCP machines (website/www and maps). It also distinguishes itself from the sibling get_mcp_hub by explicitly pointing to '/mcp-hub (get_mcp_hub)', so an agent can tell this tool apart.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly says 'USE to tell an agent there are TWO endpoints (www vs maps)' and clarifies the hub HTML belongs to get_mcp_hub, not this tool. It also rules out the CLI npm channel as a separate third channel, giving clear selection guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All ikeytz – Schlüsseldienst Ludwigsburg tools Inspect

Try in Browser

RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0

Disambiguation3/5

Many tools have clearly distinct roles, but there is real overlap: get_discovery duplicates get_llms_txt/get_llms_mcp_server/get_sitemap_txt, get_it and get_mcp_hub describe the same machines, and get_page_summary is a stub that competes with get_ai_page/get_serp_snippet. The detailed descriptions help, but an agent could still misselect among the discovery and pointer tools.

Naming Consistency4/5

The overwhelming majority follow a consistent snake_case verb-noun pattern: get_*, list_*, compose_*, resolve_*. Minor deviations like site_overview, get_it, and find_by_keyword are readable but break the dominant convention.

Tool Count2/5

45 tools for a single small-business website is excessive and well above the 25+ threshold. Many tools are pointer/list aliases or discovery-file accessors that could be consolidated without losing capability.

Completeness4/5

Core workflows are well covered: identity, contact, emergency info, pricing, invoicing, service areas, FAQs, legal pages, and generic page content via get_ai_page. Minor gaps exist around explicit opening-hours details, existing customer reviews, and maps-domain functionality, but these are mostly declared out of scope rather than dead ends.

Resources

Need Help?